Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Justa
The courts are VERY CLEAR that their highest concern in the well being of the children is that they have access to good relationships with both parents.

But, these days, the court's "concern for the well being of the children" is a bit off. Even if one parent is using drugs or hooking up with people at rest stops or physically abusing the other parent, the court will order visitation with that parent.

So, the judge's contention that the father is wonderful and the mother is evil really doesn't tell us much. Maybe the mother did brainwash the children, or maybe not.

43 posted on 07/11/2015 1:45:34 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Tired of Taxes

“So, the judge’s contention that the father is wonderful and the mother is evil really doesn’t tell us much. Maybe the mother did brainwash the children, or maybe not.”

I think the judge is simply trying to enforce the family court’s value that children have a good relationship with each parent. She encountered stiff resistance from the mother to the point of the children refusing to eat lunch with him in the courthouse cafeteria. That’s a pretty strong indicator of tremendous alienation of affection i.e. brainwashing.


49 posted on 07/12/2015 5:09:15 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson