Skip to comments.
FBI say Dylann Storm Roof background check failed
Fox radio news
Posted on 07/10/2015 10:06:43 AM PDT by navysealdad
FBI director James Brien Comey, Jr. say's Dylann Storm Roof background check failed.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: banglist; charleston; dylann; dylannroof; roof; southcarolina; storm; therooftheroof
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
The last I initially heard his dad gave the gun to him as a birthday present. Imagine that...
41
posted on
07/10/2015 11:41:10 AM PDT
by
Jim Shoe
To: Jim Shoe
OMG I have seen someone post that every single time this subject comes up.
NO THE FATHER DID NOT BUY THE GUN
NO THE FATHER DID NOT BUY THE GUN
NO THE FATHER DID NOT BUY THE GUN
NO THE FATHER DID NOT BUY THE GUN
I thought we were better informed around here!
p.s.- comment not meant to be directed negatively at you Mr. Shoe.
42
posted on
07/10/2015 11:52:02 AM PDT
by
The Toll
To: navysealdad
Per Fox News (Harris Faulkner is much prettier than shep!)...
A felony arrest the previous Spring (winter?), should have kept the little maniac from making the purchase. Mumble mumble data entry error...mumble mumble not sure where the issue occurred.
Of note, a review of NICS databases and checks is planned. If chicanery was to be ... ‘chicaned’ a tinfoil hat observation would have the holders of that data calling a halt to checks until the process could be thoroughly evaluated and overhauled.
Just a tinfoil observation.
KYPD
43
posted on
07/10/2015 12:33:28 PM PDT
by
petro45acp
(Grubbers "stupid" electorate is starting to look very much like Romney's 47%. Just sayin...)
To: Gaffer
Notice he did not say that Roof failed the background check. He is saying the background check failed.
Guess we need to ban gun purchases from anyone who ever visited Gettysburg/s
44
posted on
07/10/2015 2:34:58 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: dware
A loophole in the check system allowed the man, Dylann Roof, to buy the .45-caliber handgun despite his having previously admitted to drug possession, the bureau said.
So why is the government promoting the use of marijuana?
45
posted on
07/10/2015 2:36:28 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: navysealdad
I thought ,,,
therefore,I am.
don’t give a rip much ,,
46
posted on
07/10/2015 2:55:30 PM PDT
by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: Paulie
Meaning the government needs much more access to real-time state info, mere drug possession charges will be enough to make you a prohibited person, and there will be a push to disqualify anyone who has ever been to a psych treatment.
47
posted on
07/10/2015 2:55:48 PM PDT
by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
To: Gaffer
The problem is that courts have ruled repeatedly that mere drug possession does not make one an "unlawful user," a term that has no real basis in law.
They are saying that by admitting to drug possession when he was arrested, that he is disqualified from possessing a firearm. That is not correct, based on everything I know.
48
posted on
07/10/2015 2:58:25 PM PDT
by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
To: Paulie
Meaning he bought the gun, went through government operated background check, and was given clearance when he should have been denied clearance. Basically, the government broke the law.
49
posted on
07/10/2015 3:01:37 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: dware
--
A loophole in the check system ... --
Ban the check system loophole!
50
posted on
07/10/2015 3:04:05 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Gaffer
--
My mom (rest her soul) used to say that while there were Democrat/Republican differences at election time, they settled down and did what was best for the country. I believe that's why we won WWII in part. --
It's also why the PTB are pining for war or some other "common enemy" to rally the public behind.
51
posted on
07/10/2015 3:05:22 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: petro45acp
I have read both that it was a misdemeanor arrest and a felony arrest. I doubt it was a felony arrest.
A misdemeanor drug arrest is not enough to disqualify a person on a 4473, from what I know. The FBI director seems to be trying to expand the definition of "prohibited person" on his own.
52
posted on
07/10/2015 3:08:59 PM PDT
by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson