To: Kaslin
My BS meter is pegged over on this. No child of that age would succeed in getting that coverage without getting her face covered. . . And what's with the symmetrical hand shaped bare spots on each shoulder/upper arm? There is no way she could stepped into that bucket then gotten herself so completely covered, then stepped out, then leave such neat tracks on the hardwood floor. Her legs are shorter than the bucket is tall. It would have been tipped over. She'd be dripping all over. This child was
dipped in that paint bucket! This was staged and she's posing.
Set up!
52 posted on
07/09/2015 3:17:06 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
I don’t think it is a set up. I think the child was somehow able to pour it all over her front. I’ll bet her back is not painted. The arms show that she reached down into the bucket, leaving her shoulders and face bare. That is why only the edge of her hair is painted. You can see her artwork on the fireplace and her footsteps across the floor.
It is possible she got her small body all the way into the bucket. It is just as possible that she simply poured it down her front somehow.
57 posted on
07/09/2015 3:47:27 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Swordmaker
She got paint in her hair and if you notice her hair is all over her face.
This was staged and she's posing.
Set Up!
Yeah right *rme*
75 posted on
07/10/2015 5:08:02 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson