do they have nay rights whatsoever?
are hatred and contempt now ILLEGAL??
They were in contempt of court for ~their~ refusal to have lunch with their father. How reasonable of them is that?
Their minds are poisoned to the point of rationalizing contempt of court being preferable to a lunch with dad. Sick. The good judge is doing her part to bring a little clarity and reason into their lives. And she’s separating them from the source of their hatred and contempt in doing it. Bravo for the judge.