They were in contempt of court for ~their~ refusal to have lunch with their father. How reasonable of them is that?
Their minds are poisoned to the point of rationalizing contempt of court being preferable to a lunch with dad. Sick. The good judge is doing her part to bring a little clarity and reason into their lives. And she’s separating them from the source of their hatred and contempt in doing it. Bravo for the judge.
You know I’ve seen this meme repeated several times...their minds were poisoned etc....and what evidence do you have of that?
The word of the father...who already tried to get a court to send his kids back to israel?
His well paid lawyers?
The Judge?
How does a judge have the power to decree that you must love your father?...or even speak to him?..or say sorry for ANYTHING.
The father is obviously willing to see his kids detained in custody rather than be with their mother.
The judge is clearly willing to have them detained for disrespecting her authority.
And the kids appear willing to stick to their guns and not see or speak to their father.
So now what?
Should they all be held until age 18?
As a divorced father of three... who went through a messy divorce....he wins the asshole of the year award.
If my kids didnt want to see me, I’d respect their wishes and let them be...not run to family court and make a stink like this.