Posted on 07/08/2015 10:51:47 AM PDT by jimbo123
While Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton now says cities should comply with federal immigration requests, she has been a supporter of sanctuary city policies in the past.
In 2007 at a Democratic debate in New Hampshire Clinton expressed support for sanctuary city policies:
-snip-
During an interview with Bill O’Reilly in 2008, highlighted this week by MRCTV, Clinton was equally on board with the idea of sanctuary policies:
O’Reilly: Are you going to crack down on the sanctuary cities?
Clinton: No, I’m not. And I’ll tell you why.
O’Reilly: Whoa.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
So when will Jeb flip-flop on his support and funding for Sanctuary Cities as Governor of Florida?
Hillary and Jeb are no doubt busily trying to erase the way back machine right now.
She's only in the race because her and Bubba are great money raisers. Notice that she's spent sh**.
I'd say Bubba's looking for a job in one of the islands where they go necked.
I voted for George H.W. Bush twice. He immediately went back on his “no new taxes” pledge. Plus he went soft on border enforcement and signed the law allowing extended families to enter. He was a corporatist elitist and at heart a New England social liberal.
I voted for George W. Bush twice. He lost his veto pen the first day in office. The country went from balanced budgets with the prospect of paying off the entire national debt within 10 years to doubling the national debt. He added billions of spending, let Henry Paulson bail out the banks and GM in 2008, and signed up for TARP giving his successor an $800 million slush fund and a permanent expansion of the baseline budget. He also put John Roberts on the Supreme Court and tried to put Harriet Myers on the court. He also was soft on border enforcement and tried to get amnesty through Congress. His “no child left behind” initiative has helped the left accelerate the destruction of public schools while funneling billions to the education bureaucracy. When pounded by the press and the Democrats he would not fight back or take a stand for freedom from big government tyranny.
Now the third Bush wants to be POTUS and is trying to position himself for the primaries. Sorry, but Jeb is a full fledged social liberal and Chamber of Commerce corporatist on economics. He is also an socialist elitist who looks down his nose at middle Americans in flyover country. If he wins the nomination I won’t vote for Jeb simply because he is the “lesser of two evils”. I’ve learned evil is evil and rewarding the lesser of two evils only makes it easier when a greater evil administration replaces the lesser evil administration. In 2016, if the nominee is another corporatist owned by the Chamber of Commerce and northeastern secular establishment I’ll vote 3rd party or stay at home.
I do believe the GOP ticket will be Jeb and Carly.
Two-fre that I won’t be voting for!
Maybe I am mistaken but Feinstein was mayor of san francisco when it was a sanctuary scity?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.