Posted on 07/08/2015 9:31:25 AM PDT by re_tail20
The Obama administration on Wednesday will announce new rules requiring cities to look for racial bias in housing practices in order to promote racially integrated neighborhoods, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.
The rules would further the work of the landmark 1968 Fair Housing Act, which made it illegal to refuse to sell or rent a home to a person based on race, religion, gender or national origin.
The Post said cities and towns now would be required to look for patterns of racial bias in local housing, report the results every three to five years and set goals on how to reduce segregation in housing.
Julian Castro, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, will announce the new rules on Wednesday in Chicago, the Post said.
"This is the most serious effort that HUD has ever undertaken to do that," the Post quoted Castro as saying. "I believe that it's historic."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
“And theres no guarantee that a Republican in the White House will be any better.”
Exactly. How many liberal bureaucrats did George W. Bush eliminate from the bureaucracy? How many regulations issued by his predecessor did George W. Bush rescind?
The last Republican President is responsible for the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security.
This stuff never works. The whites just move on and the neighborhoods turn into slums. What else is new?
Not to mention John Roberts.
The wife and I drove through Boone County on a side trip from Branson to Eureka Springs last May. Beautiful country around those parts.
Right. Like they won’t be exempted/ “overlooked”.
And just who the hell is HE to dictate where people can live or the character of neighborhoods? Next he’ll be dictating what kind and color of underwear we can wear. Or the color of our toothbrushes.
Louie Farrakhan, has been promoting this idea for a long time, though- he is not the originator. He wants organized urban black youths, to move to black-only communes in predominately white rural and semi-rural communities. It is to be a jobs/cultural revitalization project under federal control. This is an end game plan, under construction since the ‘70s.
I'm sure I forgot all manner of culturally diverse rituals that 0bama wants us to experience first hand.
It only helps the Welfare Warriors and Race Pimps who will be hired to further trash America!
They will get the big bucks for “planning and executing” these foul schemes!
2016 cannot get here soon enough!
ping
“...are there because the folks who live there are lazy!
Trillions of dollars have been spent on the War on Poverty...”
I might be lazy too if I knew that someone else was paying my way. The cause of the problem is the welfare state, not the other way around imho. With the destruction of the family probably the primary result of the welfare state, and all of the other problems trickling down from that.
And it will be interesting to see the effect of the gay marriage ruling long term - another attack on the family.
Gee, I wonder how well the redistribution scheme will go here! SMH
FRom what I have seen, living in the inner city projects or the ghetto on welfare is no way to live.
They live there because they refuse to educate themselves and are lazy!
There are a lot of successful people who started out in the inner city projects or the ghetto on welfare and broke the code. They got out and became successful because they recognized the dangers of staying there, and extricated themselves FRom a life of welfare and poverty.
Pulled themselves up by their bootstraps is what they did.
If they can do it, others can do it!
Please do not get me started on homosexual marriage!
Time to get the water bucket an start collecting blood. Not of patriots though.
Since I was born here, I check “Native American.”
“There are a lot of successful people who started out in the inner city projects or the ghetto on welfare and broke the code.”
I agree - but when the government subsidizes laziness it is a lot more difficult to break out. Even FDR warned against it when he was promoting a “hand up, not a hand out”.
From his 1935 State of the Union speech (second paragraph esp):
A large proportion of these unemployed and their dependents have been forced on the relief rolls. The burden on the Federal Government has grown with great rapidity. We have here a human as well as an economic problem. When humane considerations are concerned, Americans give them precedence.
The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole our relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.
It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers.
The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.
I am not willing that the vitality of our people be further sapped by the giving of cash, of market baskets, of a few hours of weekly work cutting grass, raking leaves, or picking up papers in the public parks. We must preserve not only the bodies of the unemployed from destitution but also their self-respect, their self-reliance, and courage and determination.
I don’t care a whit what Obama decrees, demands or orders.
The moron works for me, I will simply be embarrassed that the fool is still there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.