Posted on 07/05/2015 7:38:15 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Looks like somebody who could be Obama’s son.
I'll bet its not 'workplace violence' either. Six two and even that Obama's son look alike perp is not employed.
We live in a civilized country. This poor man shouldn't have to walk around expecting blacks to attack him in broad daylight with people around in a public place. He is the victim here. Why blame him for not defending himself when he was attacked from the back? Maybe he didn't walk past these little thug criminals to begin with. They came up from behind him. Maybe he never saw them coming. All the blame here is on the criminals and not on the victim.
Why did no one come to his defense or assistance? Were these thugs just allowed to walk away to do this again without the police intervening and arresting them? With such good descriptions of them from the video, I hope they are identified and arrested and prosecuted for felony assault.
These type of black on white attacks are becoming quite common. To me they indicate that government “laws” and “regulations” are failing to control black behavior. Whether whites have the strength to return to the doctrine “an attack on one of us is an attack on all” remains to be seen.
Another reason for open carry.
Turd-brained decision to critique the actions of the victim here, wad chunks. You should think first, and then after careful consideration, not type anything.
Looks like a gang initiation to me, the wingman in the grey was the witness. The poor guy thought he was safe or something. The headphones certainly deprived him of any hint of the rapid approach from behind. The thug, if he is caught and the punishment is more than a gentle slap on the wrists, will only be getting his street creds.
We no longer have any expectation of safty. Police protection is spotty at best and the nation is flooded with illegal criminals. Save the music for safe quarters, try to never go anywhere alone and always keep a casual eye on your six. If you can prepare beyond simple measures do so by all means. Lk 22 35-38
Oh and don’t forget to have fun out there, we’re supposed to at least appear to be enjoying life, that really ticks em off.
the 52 yr old navy vet was not knocked out, he was attacked from behind and fell to the ground.
hitting the sidewalk did more damage then the punk
Hey Jesse and Al! I think you have a problem in your own house. Perhaps you need to fix that before you stick your faces in front of another camera and cry "victim" again. It just doesn't ring true anymore.
“With such good descriptions of them from the video, I hope they are identified and arrested and prosecuted for felony assault. “
I could have provided a fairly good description of the culprits without even seeing the video.
I turned it into a gif to make it easier to show and warn people.
http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/7-05-2015/zdaGmx.gif
Related story: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3307957/posts
Quite easy, actually.
Monday morning quarterbacking is easy if you'er not in the game playing. This is not a time for second guessing what the victim "should" have done.
On the contrary, to prevent this type of goings on, every day is in fact the correct time to discuss the situation..
This man could have easily been severely injured by this attack. If the man's head would have hit the pavement at the wrong angle, this knockout punch could have killed him.
That is factual, which is why the conversation is needed.
We live in a civilized country.
No, not really. We only have the rule of law. Remove that, and the society get uncivil real quick.
This poor man shouldn't have to walk around expecting blacks to attack him in broad daylight with people around in a public place.
Self preservation requires being prepared for just that very thing.
He is the victim here.
Why, yes he is, and a very unfortunate one at that. Could have ended his life at that very moment, except for the Grace of God.
Why blame him for not defending himself when he was attacked from the back?
I am not blaming him for not defending himself. That is his decision. However, if he was not beebopping with ear phones on, he may have avoided the attack, or have been prepared for it?
Maybe he didn't walk past these little thug criminals to begin with. They came up from behind him.
It does appear he was walking along the curb, and the direction from where appears to have come is where the thugs came from, and appear to still be lingering in that same area, as he collects himself and gets up. Regardless, he was in fact oblivious to his surroudings.
Maybe he never saw them coming.
Indeed.
All the blame here is on the criminals and not on the victim.
What is with the blame game? The criminals are murdering thugs, they should be disposed of as mad dogs. The victim was in fact just that. The question is why, and how can it be prevented.
Why did no one come to his defense or assistance? Were these thugs just allowed to walk away to do this again without the police intervening and arresting them? With such good descriptions of them from the video, I hope they are identified and arrested and prosecuted for felony assault.
Doesn't change the fact that the victim was attacked. And if he doesn't lose the headphones and become aware of his surroundings, he is inviting just such an attack.
Thank you for your clever and well crafted prose. It shows your clear thinking and critical thought process.
That word, I don't think it means what you think it means.
Agreed.
Did I say "punk"? I meant to say *savage*.
When entering urban environments you are best served by carrying with you little bells and pepperspray.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.