To: SeekAndFind
Once again Texas leads the way. Excellent!
To: SeekAndFind
Actually he said MAY and he further qualified it by stating each case should have its own facts.
It was not a blanket endorsement to refuse as media is portraying it
3 posted on
06/30/2015 6:40:29 AM PDT by
RWGinger
To: SeekAndFind
We haven’t seen the end of this by a long shot. This could easily be the Ft. Sumter of the modern age.
4 posted on
06/30/2015 6:45:39 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: SeekAndFind
If Wall Mart checkers can refuse to ring up pork ....
6 posted on
06/30/2015 6:56:26 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Barack Obama is not inarguably sane.)
To: SeekAndFind
"Justices of the peace and judges similarly retain religious freedoms, and may claim that the government cannot force them to conduct same-sex wedding ceremonies over their religious objections,..." As elected positions in Texas, the Justice of Peace performing or not performing the ceremony has potential for getting politically tough.
7 posted on
06/30/2015 7:23:29 AM PDT by
GregoTX
(Remember the Alamo)
To: SeekAndFind
Wondering .... why does one even need a license to marry?
9 posted on
06/30/2015 8:32:19 AM PDT by
Mitzi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson