Skip to comments.
Did The Four Dissenting Justices In Gay Marriage Case Just Suggest Treason?
The Daily Beast ^
| 06/28/2015
| Jay Michaelson
Posted on 06/28/2015 7:51:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
Treason has been committed by those who foisted their personal opinions upon the U.S. They have given aid and comfort to the enemy: those who will not abide by the law.
There is no “law of the land” there is only a Judicial Putsch.
3
posted on
06/28/2015 7:54:43 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
To: SeekAndFind
Did The Four Dissenting Justices In Gay Marriage Case Just Suggest Treason?If it is necessary to suggest that the sun rose this morning.
4
posted on
06/28/2015 7:56:06 PM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(America, a Rule of Mob nation)
To: SeekAndFind
Loving v. Virginia didn’t challenge the institution of marriage in any way, it removed limitations on heterosexual marriage that were rather absurd. The current case redefined the meaning of marriage so as to make it meaningless.
5
posted on
06/28/2015 7:59:33 PM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: SeekAndFind
It is very strange. The people who are running things now - in the media, academia, government, even corporations - are often former left-wing radicals who advocated open revolt against the government.
But suddenly rebellion - once their highest goal - is treason. As for me, I'll be flying the DONT TREAD ON ME flag this weekend, not Old Glory. And I will boycott the family 4th of July party, held at my liberal sister's place.
To: SeekAndFind
it is not treason to ask Congress to use its constitutional powers to limit the purview of the courts
7
posted on
06/28/2015 8:03:40 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: SeekAndFind
(Sad) Bottom line; the issue is settled law. The Supreme Court sometimes reverses lower courts. It does not reverse itself.
Even worse, Obama thinks he is on a roll.
His next two (highly illegal/improper) Executive Actions may be to try to give voting rights to everyone in the US who (supposedly) pays taxes, etc;, i.e. all the illegal (democrat-voting) immigrants. Citizenship would not matter. They would not have to establish IRS compliance either. The fact that they paid sales tax when they bought their latest 6-pack of Corona would be enough for the Dems.
Next, free by Presidential pardon, all the (Black) drug dealers who pleaded down their serious felony drug dealing charges to drug possession misdemeanors, because the “system is so unfair to poor minor amount drug users.”
It’s coming.
8
posted on
06/28/2015 8:05:20 PM PDT
by
Crystal Palace East
(90% of MSM is lies, except the National Enquirer, of course :))
To: SeekAndFind
Don’t you love how the Left is suddenly in love with the concept of Treason?
Seems like only yesterday that “ dissent is the highest form of patriotism”...
9
posted on
06/28/2015 8:05:35 PM PDT
by
Kozak
(Walker / Cruz 2016 or Cruz/ Walker 2016 Either one is good...)
To: JimSEA
I thought virginia was for lovers, not loving.
Sorry. Had to go there.
Amend 14 section three may hold the remedy for our dilemma.
Ban those going against the oath and constitution forever
10
posted on
06/28/2015 8:05:54 PM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: GeronL
"It is not treason to ask Congress to use its constitutional powers to limit the purview of the courts."
Amen. Is it treason when liberals blast the court for decisions that THEY oppose?
To: SeekAndFind
Washington D.C. is AWASH in treason...
Treason from Deck to Deck, Keel to PooP Deck... on the Ship of State..
that's not even counting the sedition and espionage..
CURE!..
CWII
12
posted on
06/28/2015 8:06:37 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: SeekAndFind
SCOTUS isn’t the only one that has trouble with words. Civil disobedience is not treason.
13
posted on
06/28/2015 8:07:46 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Crystal Palace East
The court has reversed itself, as it did with Lawrence v. TX in the 1990s.
14
posted on
06/28/2015 8:08:19 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
To: Crystal Palace East
It does not reverse itself.
Yes it does, as in Brown v. Board of Education, which reversed Dred Scott. But they usually don't reverse themselves in their own lifetime, although Kennedy pretty much did that in this case. His concern for state's rights in marriage law evaporated in about two-three years.
To: JimSEA
What is often overlooked was Loving found racial standards to be so biased as to be unenforceable. A person of Arab lineage would be stopped from marrying a Persian? A Greek blocked from marrying Irish?
With sex it’s pretty binary with a few exceptions.
16
posted on
06/28/2015 8:08:44 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
To: Steve_Seattle
...Brown v. Board of Education, which reversed Dred ScottBrown reversed Plessy v. Ferguson.
17
posted on
06/28/2015 8:09:37 PM PDT
by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
To: Publius
Thanks for the correction.
To: hosepipe
19
posted on
06/28/2015 8:13:30 PM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
To: Steve_Seattle
“And I will boycott the family 4th of July party, held at my liberal sister’s place.”
_____________________________________________________
What’s the point of celebrating, anyway?
It seems like every 4th of July we have fewer liberties, rights, and freedoms than the previous “Independence” day.
20
posted on
06/28/2015 8:13:54 PM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Liberals are like the Taliban and ISIS....destroying cultural icons they don't like.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson