Loving v. Virginia didn’t challenge the institution of marriage in any way, it removed limitations on heterosexual marriage that were rather absurd. The current case redefined the meaning of marriage so as to make it meaningless.
I thought virginia was for lovers, not loving.
Sorry. Had to go there.
Amend 14 section three may hold the remedy for our dilemma.
Ban those going against the oath and constitution forever
What is often overlooked was Loving found racial standards to be so biased as to be unenforceable. A person of Arab lineage would be stopped from marrying a Persian? A Greek blocked from marrying Irish?
With sex it’s pretty binary with a few exceptions.