Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Loving v. Virginia didn’t challenge the institution of marriage in any way, it removed limitations on heterosexual marriage that were rather absurd. The current case redefined the meaning of marriage so as to make it meaningless.


5 posted on 06/28/2015 7:59:33 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimSEA

I thought virginia was for lovers, not loving.

Sorry. Had to go there.

Amend 14 section three may hold the remedy for our dilemma.

Ban those going against the oath and constitution forever


10 posted on 06/28/2015 8:05:54 PM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

What is often overlooked was Loving found racial standards to be so biased as to be unenforceable. A person of Arab lineage would be stopped from marrying a Persian? A Greek blocked from marrying Irish?

With sex it’s pretty binary with a few exceptions.


16 posted on 06/28/2015 8:08:44 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson