Skip to comments.
Obamacare Ruling May Have Just Killed State-Based Exchanges
The New York Times ^
| 25 June 2015
| Margot Sanger-Katz
Posted on 06/25/2015 8:28:26 AM PDT by Theoria
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Yosemitest
Battle Flag of the Republic of the United States
41
posted on
06/25/2015 9:37:46 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
To: XenaLee
Conservatives didnt leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left conservatives. More like, drove them out.
According to Limbaugh that's been their goal since he was still getting invites to their cocktail parties in the late 80's.
To: Lorianne
But the same subsidies exist, from the same source, in the state exchanges. What is the difference? Migrating to a different platform to buy the same insurance with the same subsidy is not an ADDITIONAL step toward a single payer.
The step that is Obamacare in the first place was already a big one, though, that is for sure.
To: LRoggy
In no universe will the demonrats ever be held responsible for anything. Soros, shill for Rothschild (wrathchild) owns voter software. Free and fair elections are a delusion.
JESUS coming back is only cure.
44
posted on
06/25/2015 9:47:21 AM PDT
by
Cats Pajamas
(Wonder what Slick and Cankles did with the rent a dogs now they have grandbaby for optics?)
To: 2harddrive
More like "eminent tribunal".
Lincoln warned us about this in his First Innaugural when he said:
"............if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
I maintain that we have ceased to be our own rulers
45
posted on
06/25/2015 10:46:01 AM PDT
by
HandyDandy
(Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
To: LRoggy
Particularly because the business side of the effects are going to come through by then.Doubt it. I fully expect the employer mandate to be postponed yet again until after the election. There is absolutely no mechanism in place to stop the usurpation of power by the Executive Branch.
46
posted on
06/25/2015 11:36:34 AM PDT
by
randita
(...Our First Lady is a congenital liar - William Safire, 1996)
To: Theoria
When the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010, most people expected that each state would want to run its own health insurance marketplace. They expected it because it was implied in the law.
47
posted on
06/25/2015 11:49:30 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Barack Obama is not inarguably sane.)
To: randita
There is absolutely no mechanism in place to stop the usurpation of power by the Executive Branch. I think those have to be created on an as-needed basis via a process called "mustering".
48
posted on
06/25/2015 11:55:37 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: cydcharisse
Just another step to a one payer system... We are really quite a long way from that.
49
posted on
06/25/2015 12:19:31 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Barack Obama is not inarguably sane.)
To: babble-on
Well, on the bright side, subsidies from the Federal ‘exchanges’ perhaps pass through fewer sticky fingers at the State level before reaching the insurance companies.
50
posted on
06/25/2015 3:24:07 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson