Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

The language is unambiguous and crystal clear. There is no reasonable way to read it other than what it says. The Roberts court would have to jump through ridiculous logical hoops in order to interpret it otherwise. Which is precisely what they will do. Before they are done they will go down as one of the most politicized kangaroo courts in American history, you heard it hear first. Too bad Alito, Thomas, and Scalia are stuck tied to Roberts who appears (whether true or not) to be bought and sold by Obama.


4 posted on 06/22/2015 5:54:52 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

Democrats will rue the day they cheered for this ruling if it goes there way. Can you imagine all future courts deciding cases by what they think Congress meant to say? I thought Republicans should have submitted a sense of Congress Resolution to the Court that said essentially that Congress understands its lawmaking role and that laws should be read with full respect to the language used. In all situations, the actual language must prevail.


7 posted on 06/22/2015 7:22:26 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

If the court rules in favor of Obama care it no longer has any vestige of legitimacy. It would then become a patriotic act to defy the court.


9 posted on 06/23/2015 4:06:24 AM PDT by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson