Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Protecting Defenders of Traditional Marriage Reintroduced in Congress
cnsnews.com ^ | June 17, 2015 | Barbara Hollingsworth

Posted on 06/21/2015 2:22:57 PM PDT by Ripliancum

(CNSNews.com) – Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) reintroduced legislation in their respective chambers on Wednesday that would prohibit the federal government from denying tax exemptions or other government benefits to individuals and institutions that promote traditional marriage.

"Protecting religious freedom from Government intrusion is a Government interest of the highest order," the bill states.

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Obergefell v. Hodges that gay marriage is a constitutionally protected right, the First Amendment Defense Act (S. 1598, H.R. 2802) would prevent the Internal Revenue Service from denying tax-exempt status to churches that refuse to officiate at same-sex weddings or from disallowing tax deductions for charitable donations to them.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; freedom; homosexualagenda; lads; mormon; ssm

1 posted on 06/21/2015 2:22:57 PM PDT by Ripliancum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

Bravo !
i am tired the the Feds using OUR MONEY derived from FORCED TAXATION to BUY US with out own money!


2 posted on 06/21/2015 2:27:42 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

IMO, this bill doesn’t go far enough. Obama will probably veto it anyway, since he has “evolved.” I’ll leave the evolved from what line alone.


3 posted on 06/21/2015 2:27:53 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

Sad state of affairs when such a law is even contemplated in the first place.


4 posted on 06/21/2015 2:33:25 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum; All
Thank you for referencing that article Ripliancum. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

This bill at least seems to be a step in the right direction to restoring the constitutional republic.

But also bear in mind that Congress wrongly continues to lay taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially anything which Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, which the Supreme Court has clarified that Congress cannot do.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

5 posted on 06/21/2015 2:35:27 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson