Skip to comments.
Putin promises 40 new nuclear missiles in 2015
UPI.Com ^
| Updated June 16, 2015 at 11:03 AM
| By Ed Adamczyk
Posted on 06/17/2015 2:04:08 AM PDT by SaveFerris
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: 444Flyer; SkyPilot; StoneWall Brigade; tuffydoodle
2
posted on
06/17/2015 2:13:59 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: SaveFerris
Makes me wonder what he has planned for 2016.
3
posted on
06/17/2015 2:25:28 AM PDT
by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: SaveFerris
Obama to Putin: The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold Wars been over for 20 years.
The media would cheer Obama’s cleverness if he said that again. Unfortunately, cleverness doesn’t help when one side is willing to use force.
4
posted on
06/17/2015 2:35:53 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: SaveFerris
This should make his FReeRepublic fan club happy.
5
posted on
06/17/2015 2:57:08 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: Pollster1
Putin is merely cashing in on the “maneuvering room” Obama promised him in 2011 after Obama’s 2012 re-election.
6
posted on
06/17/2015 2:58:34 AM PDT
by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: SaveFerris
I thought russia didn’t have the money to buy their military toilet paper even?
7
posted on
06/17/2015 2:59:17 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
To: SaveFerris
I’m sure Barrack has some programs to build new missiles here too. Something like “Akbar I” “Allah’s Spear” and so on.......all built with homing devices for guidance.
8
posted on
06/17/2015 3:08:20 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: CynicalBear
To: SaveFerris
Things are about to get interesting no question about that.
To: StoneWall Brigade
11
posted on
06/17/2015 3:27:48 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: SaveFerris
If Hillary gets in office, we are dead. There is no leader in the world that will respect that old windbag.
12
posted on
06/17/2015 3:29:40 AM PDT
by
tuffydoodle
(Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
To: tuffydoodle
At the rate we’re going, I’m wondering if we’ll make it that far without an economic balloon pop.
Guess we’ll find out.
13
posted on
06/17/2015 3:34:51 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: RC one
I've often wondered if they'll roll (openly) into Ukraine next summer. We'll have the lamest of lame ducks and be at or near party convention time. Similar events occurred in 2008 with Georgia.
In all likelihood, however, the missile rollout maintains a strong nuclear deterrent while the buy time to improve their outclassed conventional forces.
14
posted on
06/17/2015 3:54:07 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Wilby 2016)
To: Gaffer
“Im sure Barrack has some programs to build new missiles here too.”
Barry gets really excited about missile systems if the word “Dong” appears in it, just like the North Korean ones.
15
posted on
06/17/2015 4:13:23 AM PDT
by
Artie
(We are surrounded by MORONS)
To: SaveFerris
16
posted on
06/17/2015 6:49:10 AM PDT
by
mongo141
(Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
To: Joe Boucher
Not to worry we’ll help them achieve their goals.
To: Joe Boucher
If you notice, Putin is always “promising”. It’s like his new weapons and the aircraft carrier, they are all superior to everything in existence, yet they are all also, merely models sitting on a table, and being “promised”.
18
posted on
06/17/2015 9:28:40 AM PDT
by
ansel12
To: ansel12
Seems nearly every time russian advanced weapons come up against American ones, they just don’t measure up.
Cept for that damned ak thing
19
posted on
06/17/2015 12:13:02 PM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
To: Joe Boucher
I wouldn’t trade the M-16 for the AK-47, who would?
20
posted on
06/17/2015 12:21:12 PM PDT
by
ansel12
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson