"White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett is quietly working behind the scenes to build a coalition of major U.S. corporations to back President Barack Obamas goal of hashing out a global agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions at the upcoming United Nations summit in Paris.
The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained a letter that outlines how, by the end of June, Obama is looking to build a coalition of businesses to show support for UN climate talks. After that, the White House will then try to grow this group of businesses to 250 in the run up to the Paris talks this November.
The way the letter is written, its likely being circulated by someone or some group on behalf of the White House. The source could not disclose who was circulating the letter on the White Houses behalf, but did confirm the business they work for was approached to support the Paris climate talks....." - Source: Valerie Jarrett Secretly Lobbying Big Corporations To Support UN Climate Talks
------------------
The announcement comes ahead of a White House clean energy summit on Tuesday. Vice President Joe Biden, White House science adviser John Holdren and Deese will speak at the event.
Obama's Science and Technology adviser, John P. Holdren has been "on the job" since he first joined forces with Paul and Anne Ehrlich 45 years ago. Holdren advocates for the de-development of the United States:
....A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States, Holdren wrote along with Paul and Anne H. Ehrlich in the recommendations concluding their 1973 book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.
De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation, Holdren and the Ehrlichs wrote...."
2009: The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development: The Population Bomb Revisited - by Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich
"....Some of the lowest birthrates are now found in the rich, fully industrialized nations of Europe and in Japan. Thats fortunate in one respect because it is the high-consuming rich nations that place the greatest pressure on humanitys staggering life-support systems (Ehrlich and Holdren 1971, Ehrlich and Ehrlich 2005).
The big exception is the United States, which is a center of over-consumption and whose population continues growing because of a relatively high birthrate (average family size about 2.1 children, compared with 1.4 in Italy and Spain and 1.3 in Germany and Japan) and high immigra-tion rate (4 per thousand, with Italy the same, Spain 7, Germany 0, and Japan 0). The nation has recently been in the strange position of debating immigration policy without ever discussing population policy...."
Ehrlich P. and J. Holdren. 1971. Impact of population growth. Science 171: 1212-1217.
Ehrlich P., Ehrlich A., and J. Holdren. 1977. Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment . San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.
February 19, 2015: GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP NECESSARY & POSSIBLE?
"With the continued buildup of greenhouse gases and the continued apathy of governments towards the lethal results of human population growth, Paul and Anne Ehrlich believe that a potential environmental storm is building up to bring down civilization....
..... Can much of the world population come to understand that humanitys current dilemmas of environmental destruction, inequities, unemployment, and declining democracy, are not largely an accidental result of cultural evolution, but are rather mostly the consequences of deliberate planning, by those in charge, to increase their own wealth and power? Can they move dramatically to close the gap between the rich and poor that is especially dramatic in developing nations, and growing in many rich ones, especially the United States?....
[SNIP]
.....The MAHBs [mahb.stanford.edukey] strategy is threefold: foster collaboration between natural scientists and social scientists to better understand the issues; build understanding of what we call foresight intelligencethe ability of individuals, institutions, governments, and society to act (behave) in future smart ways; and engage civil society (individuals and organizations), already concerned about collapse, in ways that strengthen the political impact of their endeavors. In short, the MAHBs main goal could be said to help generate a bottom-up program to produce large numbers of global citizens, who, in turn might be able to divert society from its suicidal course. The odds of success seem small, but what choice does any ethical person have but to try?"
They like to lose their shirts?
ECO WATCH: Pope Franciss Encyclical Could Have Bigger Impact Than the Paris Climate Talks, Says NASA Scientist
Im not a religious person at all, NASA climatologist Gavin Schmidt told USA TODAY, adding that faith-based efforts to shift thinking on climate action are very promising. The Popes encyclical is probably going to have a bigger impact than the Paris negotiations.
Even though climate change is considered a secular topic, according to the Associated Press, Pope Franciss message will focus on the moral imperative to fight global warming, since the poor are the most affected by it. And the Popes message is meant for a global audience, not just Catholics. This encyclical is aimed at everyone: Let us pray that everyone can receive its message and grow in responsibility toward the common home that God has given us, the Pontiff said Sunday in before a crowd of thousands in St. Peters Square.
Jeff Kiehl with the National Center for Atmospheric Research told USA TODAY that the Popes reach could be huge. The encyclical is going to go out to over 1 billion Catholicsthats a way of getting a message across to a segment of society that the scientific community could never do, he said. I mean its just unbelievable....................
Without addressing the merits, or demerits, of green energy, why are universities making ‘investments’ in anything? Seems to me it they’ve got that much extra money they should lower tuition or modernize the library or some buildings.
If it were me writing the check for tuition and learned some of it was being used for ‘green investments’ that Valerie Jarrett is championing, I’d be mighty...upset.
The same old pigs lining up at the same old troughs.