Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Shared-Equity Housing the Wave of the Future?
Washington Monthly ^ | June 11, 2015 | Martin Longman

Posted on 06/11/2015 1:05:36 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

In the new June/July/August issue of the Washington Monthly, freelance journalist Jordan Fraade has a piece on something you may not be familiar with yet. Driven by below normal home ownership in the Millennial generation, some communities are coming up with an interesting incentive called “Shared Equity Housing.”

Because Millennials began entering the economy right around the time the economy cratered in 2008, they don’t have the savings typical of people their age. This makes finding a down payment on a house one of the most significant barriers to home ownership.

All across the country, particularly in its most expensive regions, housing developers are becoming increasingly convinced that shared-equity housing can help solve this problem. Designed as a “third way” between owning and renting, shared-equity programs promote the idea that the primary benefit of homeownership isn’t necessarily wealth building, it’s stability.

In shared-equity housing, a third party provides a one-time subsidy to prospective homebuyers, allowing them to purchase a home they wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise. The third party tends to be a governmental housing agency or an affordable-housing nonprofit, but either way, according to a 2010 report by the think tank New America, the effect is to make buying a home easier, “either by lowering the price of the home which a lower-income family is attempting to buy or by reducing the down payment which a lower-income family must bring to the deal.” However, along with that subsidy comes a critical caveat: when the time comes to resell the home, a cap is placed on how much the owners can get for it.

The article uses the family of Seattle-based Estavan Muñoz-Howard as an example of a family for whom shared-equity housing made sense.

The trade off is what you might expect. Take the casino gambling out of home ownership and you aren’t going to get any big winners. For Estavan Muñoz-Howard, however, this downside is worth it.

The biggest drawback of shared-equity housing is baked into its very premise: low-income families need to accept limits on the appreciation of their home value. “Obviously that was something that was in line with our values,” Estevan said, but it was still a hard decision for a family that lives on a nonprofit salary. The system relies on the continued generosity of nonprofits and city governments, which have limited resources. And it won’t provide any first-time, low-income homebuyers with obscene amounts of wealth. But for most Millennials, any amount of wealth building, no matter how slow, still sounds like a good deal.

It’s hard to decide how I feel about this new phenomenon. It definitely will work for some people. I know I have Millennial stepchildren who had difficulty just making enough money to move out of the house and get an affordable apartment. And I know that their experience is the norm for their generation. Home ownership seems a long way off, although I’m not that much older and I had a home by the time I was twenty-seven.

Does Shared Equity Housing provide a helping hand to the American Dream, or it is just the latest adaptation to the fact that for Millennials the American Dream is dead?

I know this much. There’s something a little different about this kind of thinking:

In particular, he and his wife gravitated toward shared equity as a way to mitigate gentrification. Brighton and nearby Columbia City have a long history as African American neighborhoods that later became home to Vietnamese and African immigrants, and they remain relatively racially integrated. The point of living there, Estevan says, should not be to get rich: “This is a social-justice issue for me. If I’m able to extract as much equity as I possibly can out of this home, that is actually to the detriment of the community that’s already here.”

I guess that he’s got a point there, but getting as much equity as you can has traditionally been a big part of the American Dream. Some would say that without it, the American Dream is not possible. Yet, the Muñoz-Howard family obviously disagrees, and maybe they’re right. Maybe they’re the wave of the future.

In any case, you should read the whole thing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; governmenthousing; housing; jobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Just making people who are not responsible enough to save up a down payment into homeowners can mean a new Detroit or Newark in a decade or two.

I’ve seen plenty of houses trashed in Florida by “homeowners” without a true stake in the property after the Bush boom.

Perhaps the Islamic partial purchase method where people buy about 3% a year and rent the remaining 97% (and 94%, 91%etc.) could be used instead. The Islamic gradual purchase method totally prevents people from getting underwater. I believe it is sometimes used in Britain.


21 posted on 06/11/2015 2:25:01 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If only there was something the government could do to force lenders to sell houses to people with no down payment or provable income.


22 posted on 06/11/2015 2:25:02 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not already happening.


23 posted on 06/11/2015 2:27:37 PM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I’ve posted ad nauseum that as long as Americans won’t have children our overlords will simply import them from elsewhere; there is no way our massive bureaucracy will simply accept layoffs and look for work in the bleak private sector. They are moving millions here to simply keep neighborhoods occupied, schools filled, and store aisles humming. Work isn’t even in the equation at this point...


24 posted on 06/11/2015 3:07:25 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

People build (and rebuild) nations; after Obama’s re-election in 2012, I’m convinced there aren’t enough Americans left to do this. Romney lost because he was a wealthy white straight man; to many in this country that is cause for revulsion.


25 posted on 06/11/2015 3:11:00 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

Keep a close eye on the emerging crop of new, fresh face conservatives.


26 posted on 06/11/2015 3:13:23 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This has nothing to do with housing and everything to do with propping up housing prices.


27 posted on 06/11/2015 3:18:47 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

From your lips to God’s ears.


28 posted on 06/11/2015 3:28:21 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

Some groups that see themselves as alternatives to Habitat for Humanity.
Instead of building a $50,000 house, $5,000 moves ten families into houses that might otherwise be vacant or rentals.


29 posted on 06/11/2015 4:17:25 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson