Posted on 06/09/2015 5:11:43 AM PDT by NYer
Catholic ping!
Time to take bets.
Pedophilic marriage.
Bestiality marriage.
Polyamory marriage.
Unknown marriage.
Can we get any lower?
I object to homosexual marriage, although I’m OK with civil unions, because (as Whoopi might say) it isn’t “marriage marriage.”
I hold a similar attitude towards polyamory. If people want to participate in the promiscuity of a commune, that’s their business, but it isn’t “marriage marriage” either.
Well, I'm considering proposing to American Pharaoh.
For the Net Worth he has now I might join you.
A big motivation of the left is to import Muslim men with their several wives and 20 children. Think of the vast welfare programs these immigrants will vote for! They will outnumber Western people quickly then. Maybe the left imagines an America that is half Islamic, half communist.
Do not forget Pedophiles marrying the children love interests...after all, its only a logical extenstion of the “born this way” false argument that has been part of the success of the homosexual agenda.
I thought it would be pedophilia marriage, especially man/boy marriage, before polygamy.
Abandon Biblical morality and there is a return to the pagan equivalent of going to college:
http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/175/examining-greek-pederastic-relationships
...The ideal pederastic relationship in ancient Greece involved an erastes (an older male, usually in his mid- to late-20s) and an eromenos (a younger male who has passed puberty, usually no older than 18) (Dover, I.4.: 16). This age difference between the erastes and the eromenos was of the utmost importance to the scheme of the ideal pederastic relationship...
... Another important reason for the age difference between the erastes and eromenos was that the older male was responsible for teaching the younger male about Greek politics, military, and social gatherings (Hubbard, Introduction: 12). The ideal erastes was meant to be more of a teacher than a lover. The eromenos would receive this training in exchange for the sexual favors he provided to his erastes...
Probably, but their goal is pedophilic homosexual “marriage”.
polygamy is more acceptable, but MB “marriage” is certainly on the left’s goal
Dead puppies.
I think BI is next. It’s the B in LGBT!
Of course. What did any one expect. Pretty soon there will be a “POLYGAMOUS” group demanding the same rights as the LGBT crowd has. Then there will be people that will demand the right to marry animals. Are you or anyone will tell these people what “LOVE” means?
There’s already been “Big Love” and other cable shows to normalize polygamy, plus a slew of articles on “fairytale” 3 men homosexual marriage in Thailand and 3 women in UK, plus a 2 lesbians plus a guy “group marriage” in California, saying isn’t it great the kids have a mommy and a mommy and a daddy?
I don’t know on what legal basis the courts could tell consenting adult same-sex couples they’re allowed to marry whomever they love, and then tell consenting adult same-sex or mixed groups of three or more (or for that matter, closely-related consenting adults) “No, you can’t, that’s different.”
Gnosticism vs. The Incarnation: The Ancient Battle Renewed (contemporary sexual revolution)
If I can’t marry my John Deere, the discussion is over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.