Posted on 06/05/2015 9:30:38 AM PDT by rktman
When adjustments are made to compensate for recently discovered problems in the way global temperatures were measured, the slowdown largely disappears, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration declared in a scientific paper published Thursday. And when the particularly warm temperatures of 2013 and 2014 are averaged in, the slowdown goes away entirely, the agency said.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
u.n.-- is so
u.s.-- is not
u.n.-- is so
u.s.-- is not.........................
How about a steamin' cup of STFU. The erf's gonna do whatever it wants. Oh, wait. Maybe we could make erfquakes a crime. Yeah, that'll stop 'em. Up next: "The joys of cooking over dung fires".
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.”
NOAA is the new abbreviation for BS.
Oh noes. The earth isn’t warming like we say it ought to. Well can we squint our eyes and look crosswise at the temperatures so that we can see that the earth IS warming like we say it ought to?
I checked out WUWT about this issue. Seems that the attempt to adjust actually is bearing strong witness about how unreliable many existing measurements are. And it is accusing satellite readings, that have remained boringly level, of lying.
Is that a direct replacement for IPCC=BS?
Nonsense Observations About Anything
No doubt. Those evil dang satellites have been duping us for a long time now. You just can’t trust them.
Balogna Science.
The best thing we know of at this point is the satellites. If it was desired to audit them scientifically, they could be checked against temperatures taken on such things as drilling rigs (which do not suffer from the bobbing problems that buoys do).
But that would be science. Who needs science? We want pixie dust.
Oooo you been burned by a real climate scientist.
Another strange coincidence is that the paper has been published in the midst of President Obama's major push to issue carbon regulations. I'm sure it's just an accident of timing and has nothing to do with the politics of advancing the global warming agenda.
Not strange at all. It’s standard operating procedure.
Jethro Bodine and Elly May Clampett used to argue “is to, is not ....” Haven’t been able to find video.
Government agencies all need to be required by law to report the raw data for any of our sensoring mechanisms. Any modified data must be reported as modified data. The only adjustments done to raw data should be related to malfunctioning sensors or random out of range data points. Mann and the East Anglia folks no longer even have their raw data. It could not be produced when requested. These fools are not scientists. They have no game and no future. They are actually now rebiasing their old biasing of the data. That is the problem with chronic liars. They have to deal with their old lies.
I am so sick of all the lying that I don’t give a hoot if the entire planet burns up or freezes.
But then came satellite observations, and that lead to the realization that there really has been not warming for the past 17 years or so. So what they did was throw out the satellite readings and just went with land and water based readings. But even that didn't help enough for their purposes, so they adjusted the readings from 1980 to 1999 so that they actually showed a decrease in temperatures during that time - and which of course showed an INCREASE in temperatures from that new lower reading over the past 15 years.
It is interesting reading to see all of manipulations they go through to try to justify their lies...
What sort of devious mind comes up with this crap? Just think if they actually put their nefarious efforts in to doing something good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.