Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emails Raise Questions of Bias in Case Against Bakers Who Denied Service for Same-Sex Wedding
The Daily Signal ^ | June 1, 2015 | Kelsey Harkness

Posted on 06/02/2015 2:18:15 AM PDT by Timber Rattler

The Daily Signal has exclusively learned that the government agency responsible for enforcing Oregon’s anti-discrimination law appears to be working closely with a powerful gay rights advocacy group in its case against Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa.

Communications between the agency, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, and the LGBT organization, Basic Rights Oregon, raise questions about potential bias in the state’s decision to charge the Kleins with discrimination for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.

In April, a judge for the agency recommended the Kleins be fined $135,000.

Communications obtained through a public records request show employees of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries—which pursued the case against the Kleins—participating in phone calls, texting, and attending meetings with Basic Rights Oregon, the largest LGBT advocacy group in the state.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: lgbt; mafia; sweetcakes
I guarantee that the same thing is going on up in Washington State with the florist case.
1 posted on 06/02/2015 2:18:15 AM PDT by Timber Rattler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

The #1 gay bar pickup line:

“Can I push your stool in for you?”


2 posted on 06/02/2015 2:26:47 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (When things are rightly ordered, man is steward of God's gifts and civil law enables him to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Hey!!! I’m trying to eat breakfast!


3 posted on 06/02/2015 2:29:10 AM PDT by Paulie (America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paulie

Lowbrow humor is not for the faint of heart :)

I admit it was pretty ghastly.


4 posted on 06/02/2015 2:41:51 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (When things are rightly ordered, man is steward of God's gifts and civil law enables him to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

lol. Reminds me the old high school joke. How do 4 gays sit a on a stool? you turn it over.


5 posted on 06/02/2015 3:44:38 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Similar MO to the EPA working with watermelon groups to perform “sue and settle” shakedowns for punishing/intimidating political enemies. Or anything else Mordor on the Potomac is involved in.


6 posted on 06/02/2015 4:43:50 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

As long as were going down that road...

Q: How do you make a fruit cordial?

A: Be nice to him.


7 posted on 06/02/2015 4:47:54 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

ok if gays come in and ask to order a wedding cake and the owner says NO, I DONT CATER TO GAYS...
HOW DO YOU SUE FOR THE EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH
forcing someone to reply in a certain way is a VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH...
HOW ABOUT THAT???
IF AN ESTABLISHMENT CAN KICK SOMEONE OUT FOR INAPPROPRIATE DRESS, OR ACTS, OR SMELL OR WHATEVER....WHY CANT A BUSINESS KICK SOMEONE OUT FOR VIOLATING THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.. OR SIMPLY I AM OFFENDED BY THE FACT YOU ARE GAY...
TRY WALKING INTO A MUSLIM ESTABLISHMENT AND DEMANDING A PORK SANDWICH... AND THEN SUING FOR BEING REFUSED...


8 posted on 06/02/2015 4:52:12 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

9 posted on 06/02/2015 5:04:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzwhale

Wouldn’t the correct response be, “Yes our business would love to make that cake for you.” Then, when they return to pick it up, tell them, “I’m sorry, each of our employees chose to follow their own religious practices and could not bake you cake.” Maybe even followed by a “Here’s the address of a close by Muslim bakery that might be happy to bake your cake.”


10 posted on 06/02/2015 6:06:23 AM PDT by gnickgnack2 (QUESTION obama's AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Oregon ping


11 posted on 06/02/2015 7:51:12 AM PDT by goodnesswins (hey..Wussie Americans....ISIS is coming. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“Gay Rights?” In my lexicon it is “Homo-sexual Rights.” By the way I never hear anybody referring to “Hetero-sexual rights.”


12 posted on 06/02/2015 10:50:49 AM PDT by joemsewi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson