Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge
Having read the Constitution and Bill of Rights I distinctly remember something about “Free Exercise” of religion, nothing about “Free Exercise” of private parts. Yet the naughty bits seem to be more important?
4 posted on 06/01/2015 2:48:29 PM PDT by Lee Enfield (The tree ferrets give no warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lee Enfield
The libs were no fools: attacking and sidelining religion and its strong connection to the Constitution was one great way of destroying the country.

I just hope the gays (those highly literate folks who love to read deeply into history) know what's coming once the fascists/commies/islamists take over. They tend not to like sexual licentiousness. (How can you control and kill so many people when they are having so much degenerate fun?)

6 posted on 06/01/2015 2:58:11 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Lee Enfield

You also read about JUSTICE which is the Queen of Virtue-—and to force Vice in a “Justice System” onto people and onto children (pride in anal sex days) and irrational dysfunctional behaviors-—is promoting VICE and ejecting REASON from Just Law which is UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws-—should be Null and Void in a REASONED government.

All judges who throw out Right Reason and Justice (Virtue) from our legal system to promote Stalin’s Constitution need to be impeached.

When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law.

Promoting abortion (PP) and anal sex in our schools is why we have children who graduate as idiots——they have had Christian Ethics (Founding Ethics) flipped-—into Satanic, pagan (Afghani harem boy) Ethics. It is unconstitutional-—since our Constitution is based on Natural Laws and God’s Laws.


10 posted on 06/01/2015 3:15:30 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Lee Enfield; All
"Yet the naughty bits seem to be more important? "

As a matter of fact, Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A), which nobody seems to know about anymore, prohibits the states from making laws / policies which unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights. And pro-gay, PC interpretations of 14A's Equal Protections Clause aside, since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect so-called gay “rights” like gay marriage, the states in question violated Section 1, imo, by using constitutionally unprotected gay “rights” to trump 1st Amendment freedom of religious expression.

12 posted on 06/01/2015 3:32:37 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson