Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'There is a future in sodomy': Protestors take over anti-gay marriage lecture on college campus
The Blaze ^ | 5/27/2015 | Dave Urbanski

Posted on 05/30/2015 9:48:09 AM PDT by NetAddicted

As a speaker was about to begin her lecture criticizing gay marriage Tuesday on the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara, about 30 students seated in the front rows stood with signs, turned to face the rest of the audience and let loose.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: academicbias; california; education; gaystapotactics; hatecrime; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; santabarbara; uofcalifornia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: NetAddicted
A protest FOR SODOMY.....


21 posted on 05/30/2015 11:02:43 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

As a male why would I desire to put the johnson into another mans tank of stank and vise versa? Gross-— years ago we had a gay friend from church who couldn’t seem to shake the lifestyle. He fell back into it an used to complain of rectal bleeding. Poor guy—definitely a ‘catcher type’ personality. I wonder how he’s doing now or if he’s even alive.


22 posted on 05/30/2015 11:04:38 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

How have you seen it before?


23 posted on 05/30/2015 11:05:07 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

They will have the same future that the residents of Sodom had.


24 posted on 05/30/2015 11:06:33 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

whatever future there is, it is a short one-

“We have developed a quick and effective method for evaluating human customs and practices: what is their effect on human longevity? For example, smoking tobacco is frowned upon because a four-pack-a-day smoker loses about four years from his life expectancy as compared to non-smokers. This has been sufficient incentive for nationwide campaigns against smoking, against the advertising of tobacco products, and for the keeping of tobacco out of the hands of minors. The same general approach is taken toward alcoholism, the use of alcohol before operating a motor vehicle, and the use of drugs. In each instance the procedure condemned is considered both risky and life-shortening, and the weight of public opinion is brought to bear against it. Up until a few years ago, there was very little known about the life expectancy of homosexuals. It was taken for granted that it was the same as that of straight people of similar age and sex. Government agencies do not obtain the vital statistics of homosexual men and women and make no effort to find out what they are. This would be a waste of public money in view of the widely-held belief that these people are the same as anyone else, albeit with peculiar uses for their genital organs.

All of this changed in April, 1993, when Dr. Paul Cameron (Family Research Institute, Colorado Springs, CO 80962-2640) presented a paper to a meeting in Washington of the Eastern Psychological Association, entitled, “The Homosexual Lifespan.”

Dr. Cameron was investigating a question of interest: do “married” homosexuals live longer than single ones? It is well known that while the present life expectancy of a 21 year old male who gets married is age 75; a man who never marries can expect to live to age 58. Similarly, a married female can expect to reach age 80, while an unmarried female can expect to reach 67 years. Marriage has a positive (good) effect on longevity. Does something similar hold true for homosexual men and women?

It occurred to Dr. Cameron that the obituary columns of periodic publications might yield a statistical basis for such an analysis. To test this hypothesis, he compiled the obituaries from 46 consecutive days of the Washington Post and 23 days of the Oregonian and found that 73 percent of the men and 80 percent of the women lived to age 65. Comparable census figures were 73 and 85 percent. He then started to collect newspapers and periodicals published by and for the homosexual community. It took three years to accumulate enough information to reach some conclusions. His organization has continued to collect information and analyze it since 1993, but no significant modifications to his published conclusions have been necessary. His paper is based on 6,383 death notices from sixteen journals over the preceding eight years. He obtained basic information on the age at time of death, occupation, whether or not there was a live-in companion, and cause of death. He found that the presence or absence of partners made no significant difference to the life expectancy.

About 15 percent of the obituaries were of people who did not die of AIDS. The life expectancy of such homosexual men was age 42 and nine percent lived to be 65. This compares with 75 percent of “straight”, married males who reach age 65. The lesbian life expectancy was age 46 and 24 percent reached the age of 65 compared with 85 percent of married women. Subtract three years of longevity for AIDS sufferers. The male and female life expectancy of AIDS sufferers is 39 and 43 years, respectively. Of homosexual males with AIDS only one percent reached age 65, as compared to 73 percent of married males. Nine percent of AIDS-stricken lesbians reached age 65 as compared to 85 percent of married females.”

http://www.sodahead.com/living/is-the-homosexual-life-span-shorter-than-the-population-at-large/question-1142847/


25 posted on 05/30/2015 11:51:02 AM PDT by matthew fuller (Malcom X is Obama's baby daddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Because nobody has at attacked the protesters with rifles - yet.


26 posted on 05/30/2015 11:58:04 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Romans 1:..
22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.

Note also that Romans 1:32 points out that those who approve of such conduct are just as guilty as those who engage in it.

Lev 18:22 “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination....

25‘For the land has become defiled, therefore I have brought its punishment upon it, so the land has spewed out its inhabitants.”


27 posted on 05/30/2015 12:21:09 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

Interesting. Thanks for posting.


28 posted on 05/30/2015 1:04:26 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Yes, the thought of AIDS speaks well for their future.


29 posted on 05/30/2015 1:05:36 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Brown shirts at work.

30 posted on 05/30/2015 1:17:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
Subtract three years of longevity for AIDS sufferers.

So basically, the public perception is that if the homo doesn't die of AIDS, he will live a normal lifespan..... when the reality is that there are so many dangerous consequences to anal sex that if AIDS doesn't kill the sodomite first, something else will and do it fairly short order.

31 posted on 05/30/2015 1:23:48 PM PDT by hecticskeptic (In life it's important to know what you believeÂ….but more more importantly, why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
‘There is a future in sodomy’

...and that future is that you will be perfectly suited for a career in government.

32 posted on 05/30/2015 1:26:05 PM PDT by RichInOC (Unnngh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Actually, it seems to me that the protest tactics are evolving considerably.

In this case, after shouting down the speaker the protesters just walked out. Leaving her to actually give her lecture.

This is the first time, in a long time, that I’ve heard of Left-wing protesters settling for anything less than the lecture to be shut down and the speaker driven off campus. Or at least a mass of protesters.

I wonder if they’re starting to respond to the growing backlash, including from within their own Left-wing ranks, to the trend of Fascist give-no-quarter tactics against anyone who disagrees with Progressivism?


33 posted on 05/30/2015 1:38:23 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

It’s a wonder they didn’t kill her. Anything less is clearly a failure for the cause of tolerance.


34 posted on 05/30/2015 3:46:41 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Time was schools would show graphic VD photos/films to “scare straight” the students. Now they are just told to get an abortion and there is nothing to fear.


35 posted on 05/30/2015 10:10:08 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson