To: bert
“”” ...moving black people in mass into the cities is the problem.”””
Curious. Who was behind this “move” and when did it take place?
31 posted on
05/30/2015 6:43:58 AM PDT by
raybbr
(Obamacare needs a deatha panel.)
To: raybbr
The policies of the federal government and some states provided attractive inducements that resulted in a migration
Perhaps the migration was an unintended consequence of liberal exuberant enforcement of the new civil rights laws
In some cities the result was relative success. Atlanta for instance does not seem to have the problems of Baltimore and both now have black politicians in control. To me that means there is not a homogeneous black community all across the nation.
37 posted on
05/30/2015 7:03:38 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
To: raybbr
I don't see the plot in this. Blacks began moving out of the south because of Jim Crow laws and lack of opportunity at least beginning 70 years ago. The manufacturing industries were often in northern cities or centered close to them. Their descendants remained in those cities without jobs once manufacturing died off. Unfortunately, unlike Jim Crow blacks who had religion as a solace, these descendants had nothing. So they turned to crime and violence as a way of making money and letting off steam.
38 posted on
05/30/2015 7:09:53 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson