... C'mon Hillary.
Let a *real* woman show you how it's done: 
Cheers!
Posted on 05/29/2015 7:31:33 PM PDT by smoothsailing
I wouldn’t want to see that either.
He’s actually had some pretty good success. Bunch of losers, too; but he is in the game, so I wouldn’t be too critical.
That’s what I meant - possible conflict.
We’ll know soon enough, if the prosecutor objects.
I was surprised to see that this jurist was a Clinton appointee!
Maybe he despises Hillary and perhaps he respects the law and not the Clinton’s!
The other shoe will drop if and when a forensic expert is ordered.
The other shoe will drop if and when a forensic expert is ordered.
Amen to that! :)
Delay, delay delay.. Team Clinton will delay and stall this trial until AFTER she’s elected president.
It is not that it is justified. It is just that the timing is curious.
... C'mon Hillary.
Let a *real* woman show you how it's done:
Cheers!
Dredging up decades old dirt and releasing it at an opportune is the Clinton M.0.
-PJ
Good point PJ. I forgot about Henry Hyde.
This makes no sense. If Klayman filed the suit a couple of days ago, even assuming he served the defendants on the very day he filed, they would not yet have had time to file either an Answer to the Complaint or a Motion to Dismiss it. Things just don’t happen that quickly in any court. Is there a link to the Order? Or a case number. We can search it at PACER.
For later rereading.
Great. Now how many times are we going to have to see pictures of him sans shirt?
"Vote for me, I look better without a shirt than Hillary does"
Correct Ive not heard a word of this.
Klayman’s got guts—or he hasn’t been made aware of the Arkancide phenomenon.
Thanks. I saw that after my earlier post. The order is docket #40, so the article has to be wrong about when the suit was filed, wasn’t a few days ago. I haven’t taken time to look at PACER to look up the docket to see when it was filed and the intervening activity, i.e., the Answer, motions filed, the scheduling order, who the attorneys representing the defendants are, etc.
Interesting the conference is set for exactly one year to the day before our next POTUS will be inaugurated. THO, I would bet there’s gonna be a lot of rescheduling before it’s all said and done. RICO cases are very hard to win, so let’s see what Klayman can do.
Are you serious?
Are you serious?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.