Skip to comments.
White House: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq
foxnews.com ^
Posted on 05/28/2015 10:22:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: RoosterRedux
The president is ISIS’s representative in the US. Why would obie work against his constituents?
41
posted on
05/28/2015 10:56:08 AM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: RoosterRedux
That part of the world is barely worth the Plutonium we should drop on them.
42
posted on
05/28/2015 11:00:25 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: no-to-illegals
As awful as it sounds, the only REAL solution is to destroy the shrine in Mecca.
Surgically.
Mohammed predicted that if Mecca were destroyed, then Islam is not God’s religion, as he said.
But with a warning that if we see *ANY* retaliation against *ANY* American interest anywhere, the next strike will not be so surgical and will include other shrine cities throughout the ME.
43
posted on
05/28/2015 11:03:51 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
To: TADSLOS
Advantage Isis...game, set & match...goodbye
44
posted on
05/28/2015 11:04:56 AM PDT
by
rights with responsibilities
(If you like your free speech, you can keep your free speech..if you're careful)
To: onyx
45
posted on
05/28/2015 11:06:03 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Westbrook
never happen with obama, hillary, a democrat or a rino anywhere near the white hut ... all (the prior) hate you and your children ... vote them in and find the truth of my words.
46
posted on
05/28/2015 11:06:14 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Do what is Right ... Take This Freepathon Over the Top!!!)
To: RoosterRedux
47
posted on
05/28/2015 11:08:11 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(For Rent)
To: Westbrook
“They wanted us out”
We need to ponder who is “they”.
None of know what’s in the minds of our Middle East strategists. My view is that we make efforts over there only if it is in our security interests. Maybe we can withhold help from Iraq and it will work out ok for us.
Didn’t we leave because the Iraq leader insisted that our soldiers be tried for alleged offenses in their courts? Could it be that if that leader changed his mind, we’d start helping again.
While I recognize my ignorance, I also don’t trust our foreign policy leadership which starts with Obama.
To: RoosterRedux
“White House: US won’t be ‘responsible’ for ‘security situation’ in Iraq”
Of course not.
It’ll be bushs fault.
To: musicman
50
posted on
05/28/2015 11:20:06 AM PDT
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
To: headstamp 2
Obama is just imitating the Democrat congress in 1974. When the Mombasa moonbeam failed to negotiate a remaining security force, the first thing that went through my mind was the Saigon embassy. Only this time, I don't think there will be any helicopters.
51
posted on
05/28/2015 11:20:56 AM PDT
by
kitchen
(The people on the left are enemies, not countrymen with different opinions.)
To: RoosterRedux
52
posted on
05/28/2015 11:21:58 AM PDT
by
CSM
To: RoosterRedux
White House: US Obama won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq Fixed it.
-PJ
53
posted on
05/28/2015 11:26:52 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Westbrook
Your idea of destroying Mecca is the key to the entire war.
Fight their false religion with its own precepts.
54
posted on
05/28/2015 11:54:20 AM PDT
by
tractorman
(I never miss a chance to tweak a liberal.)
To: RoosterRedux
"U.S. won't be responsible for security situation in Iraq."
BUT, anything BAD that happens is BUSH'S FAULT!
To: RoosterRedux
Iraq is gone and there is going to be a bloodbath. And the idiot-in-chief in the White House doesn’t give a rat’s rear.
56
posted on
05/28/2015 12:58:26 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: gov_bean_ counter
OK, JUST SO WE’RE CLEAR ON THIS— when the ghastly images of a humanitarian crisis caused by the vacuum of accountable authority hit the news feeds, everyone whose been screaming for us to get out of Iraq are going to remain perfectly content with their choices, and the WH WILL NOT EVER COMMENT on how messed up the situation is or how terrible the conditions have become ... RIGHT?
57
posted on
05/28/2015 1:49:32 PM PDT
by
owainG31
To: RoosterRedux
This is insane. Either defeating ISIS is in our national security interests or it is not. If it is, we cannot outsource our national security to a corrupt Iraqi government.
58
posted on
05/28/2015 2:57:55 PM PDT
by
magellan
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
 |
"Except of course, when
there's a Republican
President. Oh, and,
Death to America!"
|
59
posted on
05/29/2015 6:22:13 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
60
posted on
05/29/2015 6:22:40 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
