While 0bama has a collection of about 14-15 of these smackdowns, he regards them as “guidance”, telling him exactly what he ought to do despite any pesky judicial order.
This actually isn’t a “smackdown”, which is why they went with a junior PR flack named Brandi to comment on it.
It’s an injunction. The actual law and facts haven’t made it to appeal yet. All thats happened is that those two judges have said that the states COULD have a case, and if they successfully appeal it would create a burden to them to try to undo any sort of implementation.
If anything it’s the dissenting judge who is wrong here, essentially saying that the job of the panel is to rubber stamp the Obama policy before the appeals process actually runs it’s course.