This actually isn’t a “smackdown”, which is why they went with a junior PR flack named Brandi to comment on it.
It’s an injunction. The actual law and facts haven’t made it to appeal yet. All thats happened is that those two judges have said that the states COULD have a case, and if they successfully appeal it would create a burden to them to try to undo any sort of implementation.
If anything it’s the dissenting judge who is wrong here, essentially saying that the job of the panel is to rubber stamp the Obama policy before the appeals process actually runs it’s course.
I’ll sheepishly agree w/you.
But I will return to my characterization of 0 as a juvenile delinquent. In spray painting his name on your garage door, he cared not at all as to the effort nor money nor time it took you to earn your garage door.
And you’ll be/we’ll be the ones appointed to clean it up.
I want to know who was the idiot judge on the 5th who voted to lift the stay.