Posted on 05/16/2015 3:23:36 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Heres how cynically anti-science the Warmunist lobby is. These people blame every single weather event, from earthquakes to winter storms, on Global Warming.
Al Gore and others tried to claim that Global Warming was causing hurricanes. But the hurricanes werent showing up.
Now the Warmunists could have attributed the pause to Global Warming. Were talking about people who claim the rise of ISIS is caused by Global Warming. They clearly dont have a problem attributing everything to the Warming Devil.
But what scientific explanation is being credited for the pause? Luck.
In a stroke of luck, no major hurricanes rated Category 3 or higher have struck U.S. soil during the past nine years, a new study finds. This is the countrys longest hurricane drought in recorded history, or since 1851, the researchers said. The previous record lull lasted eight years, from 1861 to 1868, they said.
So why not blame Global Warming for this one? Because the narrative only associates Global Warming with negative phenomena.
Its a propaganda gambit to get people afraid so theyll give in and let the environmentalists and Wall Street impose rationing and poverty through Carbon Credits. The narrative cant associate Warming with anything good. The whole thing is an obvious scare tactic.
2003, Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming: A Caltech Lecture by Michael Crichton
"My topic today sounds humorous but unfortunately I am serious. I am going to argue that extraterrestrials lie behind global warming. Or to speak more precisely, I will argue that a belief in extraterrestrials has paved the way, in a progression of steps, to a belief in global warming.
Charting this progression of belief will be my task today. Let me say at once that I have no desire to discourage anyone from believing in either extraterrestrials or global warming. That would be quite impossible to do.
I have a special interest in this because of my own upbringing. I was born in the midst of World War II, and passed my formative years at the height of the Cold War. In school drills, I dutifully crawled under my desk in preparation for a nuclear attack.
It was a time of widespread fear and uncertainty, but even as a child I believed that science represented the best and greatest hope for mankind. Even to a child, the contrast was clear between the world of politics-a world of hate and danger, of irrational beliefs and fears, of mass manipulation and disgraceful blots on human history. In contrast, science held different values-international in scope, forging friendships and working relationships across national boundaries and political systems, encouraging a dispassionate habit of thought, and ultimately leading to fresh knowledge and technology that would benefit all mankind.
The world might not be a very good place, but science would make it better. And it did. In my lifetime, science has largely fulfilled its promise. Science has been the great intellectual adventure of our age, and a great hope for our troubled and restless world. But I did not expect science merely to extend lifespan, feed the hungry, cure disease, and shrink the world with jets and cell phones.
I also expected science to banish the evils of human thoughtprejudice and superstition, irrational beliefs and false fears. I expected science to be, in Carl Sagans memorable phrase, a candle in a demon haunted world. And here, I am not so pleased with the impact of science. Rather than serving as a cleansing force, science has in some instances been seduced by the more ancient lures of politics and publicity.
Some of the demons that haunt our world in recent years are invented by scientists. The world has not benefited from permitting these demons to escape free. But lets look at how it came to pass........
Within a few years we’ll have another big hurricane year, and the global warming folks will have something else to chatter about.
Genius. Greenfield is a genius.
In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If its consensus, it isnt science. If its science, it isnt consensus. Period.
I say it’s Keebler Elves.
Most interesting the the reporting on EL NINO. When it looks like EL NIno is going one way, people claim it is proof of their climate agenda. But when it looks like EL NINO is going the other direction, they then say that EL NINO has nothing to do with climate change and is just a local phenomenon.
It just took him 6+ years.
maybe its chemtrails. :)
Hahahaha!
Why am I thinking that God is laughing in Al Gore’s face?
But, but I’ve still got my NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC with the big picture on the cover of Katrina trashing New Orleans, and the warning we better get ready for LOTS MORE SUPERSTORMS in the future unless we STOP GLO-BULL WARMING NOW!
That was nine years ago.
Oh, that’s right. I forgot.
LOL
And Shep and Geraldo cried.
“... If its science, it isnt consensus. Period.”
bttt
Liberal progressives are such an entertaining lot. They berate you for not obeying their “science” but then attribute the current climate condition to “Luck” instead off the actual science. Same with homosexuality...constantly commanding that gays are “Born this way” and that science “supports this!” Great...lets see how they handle this...tell them we will start a campaign to allow couples to selectively abort gay fetus’s and immediately two things will happen...1...the gays themselves will have to admit there is not basis in fact supporting “Born this way” narrative and abortion supporters will have to say “Its a Human Being” IF they really want to believe the “scientific evidence” proving gayness.
Liberal progressives....Gold Medalists in Mental Gymnastics!
Who shout down "deniers" and stop debate.
Yup...just as challenged at this subject as anything else. What it shows is their emotional inability to deal with reality and a willingness to lie to themselves and everyone else in the process.
That’s a humorous thought.
I’d like to think so.
bump
Science has also been seduced by federal grant money. We pay hard-earned money for pseudo-science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.