Posted on 05/12/2015 6:37:01 AM PDT by wagglebee
Good thing she never had a chance at winning.
Sorry honey. We’re still “supporting” their stupid ObamaCare decision.
I am glad these things are coming out early in the game, and people are saying how they feel way upstream to allow us to make intelligent decisions and determine which candidate or candidates most closely align with our own viewpoints.
Not a my house she doesn’t.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Good thing she never had a chance at winning.
_______________________________________
Maybe she could endorse pro-dope positions and go for the libertarian vote.
What exactly does “support their decision” mean?
I don’t marry people, I don’t have a bakery or floral shop. I have never been invited to a same-sex wedding, so I am at a loss as to how I would need to support their decision.
Two-sided issue. On the one hand, she’s saying “support the way our system works.” On the other, she’s accepting what could be a loaded, politically and ideologically liberal court if Obama gets to appoint just one more justice—which means she’s accepting perversion of the system while pretending all is well.
Not a chance Carly. The SC does not have the prerogative of changing the traditional meaning of marriage. That is above its pay grade.
At least she’s consistent in her position about homosexuality, even so much as to make the left look bad.
“I don’t marry people, I don’t have a bakery or floral shop. I have never been invited to a same-sex wedding, so I am at a loss as to how I would need to support their decision.”
This is not aimed at you personally, but if you attend a bible-believing Christian church you are going to be expected to support the Supreme Court’s decision. Either your church will disregard God’s word and wed homosexuals or it will lose its tax-exempt status and be forced to pay corporate income taxes on all revenue and property taxes.
Rather than carry on about a constitutional amendment that will never happen, conservative politicians should be drafting legislation protecting churches from this obvious and well-orchestrated assault.
Wrong Answer, Sweetheart.
This just illustrates the fact that decades of voting for the “lesser of evils” is just pushing the GOP further and further to the left.
A contradiction that has already proven a total failure in Indiana.
She is unfit to serve.
She is already over, and she just started.
Wasn’t Carly Fiorina’s campaign interesting? While it lasted.
Not to mention Roe v Wade
Right along side Carly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.