[UCANSEE2]

Hillary is dicking him around. And what can he do?

That was my point. There is a limit to what he can 'do' in his position. He cannot arrest anyone. His job, which he is doing, it to try and get to the bottom of this.

If that turns out to be impossible, then it is not Gowdy that is the problem. It is the criminals in our government and the apathy of the public.

[ClearCase_guy]

I think we're having a vocabulary problem. I say Gowdy is ineffectual. That means: there is a limit to what he can "do" in his position.

He can't seem to do much. Is that his fault? I'm not saying. But people on this board seem to think Gowdy is going to "do something". He going to "get the goods". He's "scheduled her testimony".

Nothing that Gowdy is doing is amounting to a hill of beans. Why? Because there is a limit to what he can "do" in his position.

So Conservatives should stop looking to Gowdy as someone who is going to achieve anything.

He's ineffectual.