Singer went on to say, I dont want my health insurance premiums to be higher so that infants who can experience zero quality of life can have expensive treatments. And WHO EXACTLY gets to define "quality of life"?
I know a man whose brother was killed on Mengele's orders because he had a slight limp. Over 90% of babies with Down Syndrome are aborted.
"Quality of life" is nothing more than an excuse to create death panels.
1 posted on
05/08/2015 7:09:27 AM PDT by
wagglebee
To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on
05/08/2015 7:09:59 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
3 posted on
05/08/2015 7:10:57 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Singer sure seems like a nazi to me.
4 posted on
05/08/2015 7:14:46 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: wagglebee
In Romania it could be because you had ears that stuck out.
In the USSR is was because you lived. A nurse there took a late term abortion baby home because the hospital refused to give him any care. They let her because they thought the child would die. But he did not. Under her care he thrived. When he was a few months old they took him away because she was not his legal mother and placed him in an orphanage. Where he weakened and died.
6 posted on
05/08/2015 7:31:50 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
To: wagglebee
The Fabian socialists get to decide who lives and who dies. Remember H. Clinton is a disciple of Margaret Sangar, the founder of Planned Parenthood.
Isn't Peter Singer also the one who put in a book that parents should have the right to abort up to 5 years old? Could being a Christian also be deemed a disability?
To: wagglebee
“zero quality of life” = “Life not Worth Living” - Sieg Hiel!
Definitely do your homework
9 posted on
05/08/2015 7:49:09 AM PDT by
nuke_road_warrior
(Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
To: wagglebee
Should severely disabled infants be killed to reduce health-care costs? Singer did not respond directly, but he said that caring for them should not necessarily be covered by a national health service.
I'm sure he thinks so, he just didn't want to say it outright. He is right on the second point though, cause there shouldn't be a national health service at all!
To: wagglebee
The problem with Singer isn’t that he failed to “do his homework”. He knows what he’s saying all right.
12 posted on
05/09/2015 7:16:46 PM PDT by
Salman
To: wagglebee
who can experience zero quality of lifeThose like Professor Singer who advocate the eugenicist position may well have attained that zero quality, but I hope they snap out of it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson