The Islamofacation of America, the press surrenders to Radical Islam.
Hate Speech is not protected by the 1st Amendment, and we get to define the word hate. - Modern Day leftist.
Its only protected speech she the left says it is.
How is this different that the Police setting up a “Bait Car” for thugs to steal in the ghetto?
Or setting up a drug sting?
Or setting up a prostitution sting?
All could end end violence, all are to make a point.
The left hated Lenny Bruce and Larry Flynt too.../s
He or she who refuses to defend the right of free speech should themselves forfeit the right to free speech.
People keep digging the hole deeper.
The liberals are inconsistent and not intellectually honest in their view of this.
In the case of “Piss Christ” or the Virgin Mary covered in dung, we are told that we need to understand about freedom of speech/freedom of expression, and the fact that people of faith are deeply offended by these depictions does not matter. What matters is the freedom to create “art” even if people of faith are offended.
But in the case of Mohammed cartoons, the liberals view it differently. In this case, the liberals say that we need to be sensitive to Islam, and not create “art” which adherents of Islam will be offended by. The concepts of freedom of speech or freedom of expression, even expression found offensive, is not a factor to liberals in this case.
Hustler magazine is 1st Amendment protected speech too. So is Klan cross-burning. Nice company she keeps.
But feel free to put a crucifix in a jug of urine for an art show, by all means.
It’s pretty offensive to muslims to see a woman outside not wearing a hijab or burka, with bare legs to boot! In muslim countries that can lead to a beating, especially if the woman is unaccompanied.
It’s also provoacative to serve haram foods in a restaurant.
And don’t forget how offensive it is to not be muslim.
Charlie Hebdo stands solidly for free expression. The West must do no less.
She’s offending all Muslims in the hope of inciting the most radical ones to react with a terroristic response. SUCCESS!
So much for Pamela Geller
So... that "someone" who decides to break out the rifle is the approval authority for what constitutes free speech. Got it.
Not sure what Pamela did was very bright, but in a clumsy way, she did a great service to America:
1- she highlighted with great clarity what a clear and present danger ISIS and radical Islam is to America, and
2- she highlighted with great clarity what a clear and present danger the mainstream media is to America
So they want “Freedom”, but blame her freedom of speech as incitement to these wackos?
Typical liberal logic!
