“They took screen shots of messages containing graphic language, obtained by the Examiner,”
Sound like this was the evidence.
No follow up to this statement in the article. Were the messages from the defendant? If part of a close and reactivated account a year later, facebook probably wouldn’t have archives of the deleted messages.
Never underestimate the viciousness of the progressive liberal democrat communists!
All the republican candidates as well as any democrat who would oppose Hitlery will soon learn this, if they have not already, even those aware have yet to experience the intensity or the lengths of malice they are willing to go.
Why is the accuser’s identity still being protected, when we know they are not a victim, but rather a criminal?
I would not accept "screen shots" as evidence of anything. I can take a screen shot of anything, and with only a few minutes work with a graphics program transform a conversation etc. into anything I want it to say. "Hey, Bill Gates decided to send me a check for $100 million, now, all I've got is a pic I took of it with my phone, I seem to have misplaced the check but..."
I'm sure there is a lot more to this story (hopefully better written somewhere too). It sounds fishy. None of this comes out until this guy rises in the GOP? Right... Funny what people suddenly "remember" about people at just the right time...
Channeling Nifong.
YouTube video by Regent law professor “Don’t Talk to the Police”.