You need Constitution lessons as well as reading comp. WTF do you suppose the word “Abridged” means in relation to his statement, which isn’t weal Mr. Blitzer. It’s whats known as a direct quote.
Because when you take guns of any form away from law abiding people you are in 100% direct conflict to the 2A. When you advocate taking guns owned by law abiding citizens from law abiding citizens, you are advocating against the 2A.
So sorry they never told you that in grade school where many of us learned the basics.
What part of “criminally insane” qualifies as “law abiding citizen” in your book, Kimosabe? If you are ready to advocate for placing semi-automatic weapons in the hands of criminally insane people in large populations, then you are ready to call Dr. Carson an advocate for stripping all urban, law abiding citizens of their weapons. I would expect as much from a Freeper who is as nuanced in thought and expression as a skunk in the application of its smell.
And the kicker is, Carson simply says he “would rather not” see the criminally insane have weapons. He does not even say he would insist on disarming them. Talk about hare, brained, hair-trigger jerk-thought. You epitomize the brainless prattle of low information voters with your bold assertions. Stop trying to prove how conservative you are and try lending an ear to those around you who agree in large part with the same things you do.