Is this the strongest arugment you can make - some sound bytes from a Glen Beck appearance? You misrepresent Carson’s position in stating the he believes cities “don’t need a Second Amendment.” But then, you’ve never shown yourself to the chillax type. I do not find it unreasonable to be concerned that a semi-automatic weapon may fall into the hands of a criminally insane person in a highly populated area. It may be wrong, but it is not particularly unreasonable or liberal, like insisting that guns be taken away from all urban dwellers as you suggest Carson to be saying. It is not as if Carson is calling for bans on gun ownership in urban environments.
Having read through the balance of your rants on this thread, you come off once again as a certified jerk. Trying being a man (if that’s what you are) and let Carson speak for himself. His positions are clear enough without your drama-queen interpretations. He is no Cruz. Nor is he a liberal. Nor will he likely be elected President of the United States. But he deserves to let his positions stand without your overdrawn, lame conclusions. I’m sure Carson is man enough to make clear where he stands on the issues, and man enough to admit when he overstates his case. You? Not so much.
Spare me the liberal talking in circles bullshit. This was discussed to death recently on FR, Every right wing radio and TV show and freaking DU. there are thousands of articles on it.
If I misrepresented him, then you need to talk to him about his quoted words. Because thats what HE said. Do you nor understand english or is it that you apply newspeak to your mewling liberalism?