|
 |
Posted on 05/01/2015 11:10:15 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, made a last-ditch push for the Senate to block a District of Columbia law Friday, but his statement was almost certainly made in vain.
Following the House vote to block D.C.’s Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act late Thursday night, the presidential candidate is urging the Senate to do the same, though senators have already left town. RHNDA is a D.C. Council measure that seeks to combat workplace discrimination based on reproductive health decisions, but conservatives say it could force employers to violate religious freedom.
“The D.C. Home Rule Act only gives Congress a limited time to act, and Congress is running the clock to the eleventh hour,” Cruz said in a statement Friday. “I applaud the House for passing a resolution of disapproval of RHNDA. I urge the Senate to immediately do the same.”
As with any D.C. law, the D.C. Council transmitted RHNDA to Congress for a 30-day review process during which time Congress can formally block the law by passing a joint resolution of disapproval. That review period ends Saturday.
Cruz, along with Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., introduced a resolution of disapproval blocking RHNDA on March 18, and the presidential candidate has been mum on the resolution since then. The Senate committee with jurisdiction over D.C. has not taken up the resolution.
Cruz and Lankford also sought to strike down another D.C. measure: the Human Rights Amendment Act, which was an attempt to undo a 1989 congressional amendment that allowed religious educational institutions to “deny, restrict, abridge, or condition” funds, school facilities and services from gay groups. Proponents argue the new act protects gay student groups from discrimination, while opponents say it would force religious schools to recognize groups that are not in line with the school’s beliefs. That resolution was also not taken up by committee.
D.C. officials and activists accused Cruz and other presidential hopefuls targeting D.C. of taking advantage of the District to boost their conservative credentials, since D.C. does not have a voting representative in Congress to defend its interests. But the lawmakers said this is not an issue of politics, but of principle, predicated on protecting the Constitution.
While time is set to run out before Congress can formally block the D.C. law, the conflict over RHNDA is likely not over. House conservatives are pushing for lawmakers to incorporate a policy rider in the District’s spending bill to block implementation of the act, though it is not clear how exactly a rider could do so.
|
|
Ted Cruz Ping! No, wait, some are critizing Ted Cruz for not voting for the illfated cause of refusing to confirm Loretta Lynch in Congress and went to a campaign fundraiser.
At what point in that article does the author even come close to proving the assertion in the headline? Hell I don’t even think he comes close to making a point.
“RHNDA is a D.C. Council measure that seeks to combat workplace discrimination based on reproductive health decisions,”
How is that even possible? “You use condoms! That’s it you are fired!”
The intent of the law doesn’t even make sense to me...
Well the opposition has nothing left but to criticize Cruz on some contrived flaw, he gives them nothing else, he doesn’t flip-flop, backtrack for suddenly change his mind on his positions, he has integrity, confidence and a whole host of positive traits, that is also something they consistently attack because they are not familiar with those things they don’t understand them, but that just makes him stronger.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.