Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Negative interest rates put world on course for biggest mass default in history
The Telegraph ^ | 28 April 2015 | Jeremy Warner

Posted on 04/29/2015 5:13:17 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Here’s an astonishing statistic; more than 30pc of all government debt in the eurozone – around €2 trillion of securities in total – is trading on a negative interest rate. With the advent of European Central Bank quantitative easing, what began four months ago when 10-year Swiss yields turned negative for the first time has snowballed into a veritable avalanche of negative rates across European government bond markets. In the hunt for apparently “safe assets”, investors have thrown caution to the wind, and collectively determined to pay governments for the privilege of lending to them.

On a country by country basis, the statistics are even more startling. According to investment bank Jefferies, some 70pc of all German bunds now trade on a negative yield. In France, it's 50pc, and even in Spain, which was widely thought insolvent only a few years ago, it's 17pc. Not only has this never happened before on such a scale, but it marks a scarcely believable turnaround on the situation at the height of the eurozone crisis just a little while back, when some European bond markets traded on yields that reflected the very real possibility of default. Yet far from being a welcome sign of returning economic confidence, this almost surreal state of affairs actually signals the very reverse. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the future? Whichever way you come at it, the answer to this second question is not good, not good at all.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bonds; centralbank; eucentralbank; eucrisis; europe; europecrisis; interest; negative; negativeinterest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I know some Free Republic members are VERY financially astute. Would one of you please explain what all of this means and the end result? Is it like Mr. Warner says? Or, is it all hype?
1 posted on 04/29/2015 5:13:17 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Would one of you please explain what all of this means and the end result?

Everything is fine. /S

2 posted on 04/29/2015 5:17:06 AM PDT by Stentor ("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Perhaps the handwriting is on the wall (cough).

Nonetheless, there are folks that believe all is peachy.

It’s been Depression II for me for several years but obviously not everyone. But more than the gov’t admits.


3 posted on 04/29/2015 5:19:20 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Basically, if you deposit 100 dollars in a European bank, instead of PAYING you annual interest on the deposited cash, they will CHARGE you a specific amount for the privilege of keeping your money in their vaults. At the end of the year, you will have less money in your account than what you started with.


4 posted on 04/29/2015 5:21:27 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

5 posted on 04/29/2015 5:22:31 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
In simple terms, this is the analogy of kicking the can down the street for the 1000th time. The envitability of QE easing (which now EU has embraced), basically translates to a credit card with a infinite limit, and the card holder can't afford to even pay the interest.

We in Freeper finacial threads have been arguing since 2008, whether we should have taken our medicine then rather than postponing it. It was my opnion then that we should havelet it play out, and rebuild from there.

In my 35 yrs. of investing experience, I have never seen such a quandary of the lack of anything decent to invest to get decent safe returns. This house of cards is going to crumble, the only really question is how bad is it goinng to get. I have prepared my portfolio for a 50-75% correction.

6 posted on 04/29/2015 5:24:09 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I have no idea. I just know I can’t get one percent on my money and I refuse to get in a stock market that is propped up by the Fed. I would if I were younger, as I could dollar cost average but I’m long past retirement age and need instant liquidity. I think this perverse in the extreme. But no matter, that sorry old lecher Bill Clinton can get $700,000 for a speech full of nothing but feces. What happened to the days of a nice three or four percent return compounded daily with instant liquidity? We’re awash in a sea of debt and they mean to keep it that way.


7 posted on 04/29/2015 5:25:06 AM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

Kinda like inflation.


8 posted on 04/29/2015 5:25:18 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

mark for later reading


9 posted on 04/29/2015 5:28:45 AM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Potemkin Economy.


10 posted on 04/29/2015 5:29:00 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

This is really hard to explain (I’m having a lot of trouble with it myself), but a few things are coming into focus.

Debt looks a lot like money. Schemes to use debt as money, in the past, have usually collapsed rather quickly (like blowing out a credit card), for obvious reasons.

If the mint coins a $20 coin, and you perform a service, getting it in return, you have $20 and no one is indebted thereby. Of course, you have that coin and no one else also has it.

Paper money is not like that. A lot of it exists as ledger entries, or electrons, and a lot of the positive balances represent someone else’s debt to the issuer (which debt, in the beginning of a paper system, is usually paid back with interest).

But men are not angels, as the saying goes, and debt-as-money requires strong regulation to make it work, because when you have $20 as a ledger entry as opposed to a $20 double eagle, a lot of people have the same $20 at the same time.

What’s new under the sun (the underlying concepts are not new) is that the powerful producer countries have entered into various compacts to ALL use paper as money, and to maintain the fiction of someone’s future productivity as “backing”, or assurance that the hundreds of trillions of obligations allowing the printing presses to roll are good.

But they’re not good, they’re just postponed.

The 102 year run of debt (or credit) as money is coming to an end. When, where, and how has not been revealed. But end it will.


11 posted on 04/29/2015 5:36:19 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Central banks with unlimited funding distort (ruin) every market they enter (manipulate).

Every bond (debt) market on earth is distorted, to the point where deflation has been institutionally created. In a short 4 months we have gone from all German bonds trading at a positive rate to 70% of them trading at negative rates. How long before they are all negative? A few more weeks?

This is a tectonic shift that no one is talking about. This is destruction of capital and wealth on a global scale.

Here is the real bad news, not only is there is no theoretical limit to negative rates, the rates don't have to go that far negative before the whole system is kaput.

Other than that, there is no problem in the foreseeable future.

12 posted on 04/29/2015 5:37:59 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Save Western Civilization. Embrace the new Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer; blam

Ping


13 posted on 04/29/2015 5:39:20 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

John Maynard Keynes once responded to criticism that “in the long run” deficit spending as a monetary policy would lead to calamity by noting the “in the long run” we are all dead.


14 posted on 04/29/2015 5:44:17 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Doesn’t the very term “negative interest rates” indicate something is very, very wrong?

The worldwide controlling politicians and financial leaders had a choice after the financial meltdown (as well as the run up to it because their derivatives, etc, caused the meltdown):

1) Repair the damage, over time and at great costs to all, by letting the losers (them) take their lumps and bear their huge losses which would have further wrecked the economy but then it could start anew on a sound footing.

2) Continue to rig the game with continued zero interest rates, QE forever, even more derivatives, etc. to further rob Main Street (that’s you and me) and enrich themselves. Not just in the USA but in all developed countries and financial systems.

Which did they choose? Hah, we know the answer to that. But now they don’t seem to know how to stop the madness they have wrought.


15 posted on 04/29/2015 5:45:48 AM PDT by citizen (WalkeRubio RIGHT For You 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

John Maynard Keynes once responded to criticism that “in the long run” deficit spending as a monetary policy would lead to calamity by noting the “in the long run” we are all dead.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And as we say now: Keynes is dead and we are stuck living in the long run.


16 posted on 04/29/2015 5:51:42 AM PDT by Blaine Fabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

GREAT movie.


17 posted on 04/29/2015 6:01:27 AM PDT by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Its nearly common sense - how long can governments expect people to PAY THEM (negative interest rates) for the pleasure of holding their debt.

It would be like the bank paying me to take a mortgage from them.

How sustainable is that?

Also, the US Government now pays about $250 billion per year on interest on old debt alone. And interest rates are at historical lows. If interest rates went to normal levels of 10-15 years ago - that debt cost would rise to $750-800 billion. Where will the US Government find money for that?

You can thank the corrupting effects of Central Banks for this, supporting the spending addiction of politicians.


18 posted on 04/29/2015 6:03:45 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blaine Fabin
And as we say now: Keynes is dead and we are stuck living in the long run.

And Keynes was a confirmed pederast who also trolled the back-alleys of London for gay sex.

19 posted on 04/29/2015 6:07:47 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Here is the practical:

Take all of your wealth denominated in “paper” and turn it into tangible assets.

Prepare to go through a tumultuous period of multiple months where no financial instruments work at any level.

On the other side of the crisis, turn some of your tangible assets into the new coin of the realm, whatever it may be.


20 posted on 04/29/2015 6:10:41 AM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson