Senator Cruz argues Lynch will be just like her predecessor...
Gave a great speech on the floor of the Senate, but did not stick around to vote because he had a “more important” speech scheduled in New York?
I know. He has never been my first choice, but this is still worry-some to me.
Yeah, but he lost the vote.
Did Loretta forget to give Ted the secret Harvard Law handshake before introducing herself?
As far as obliterating her, by all news accounts she appears to be around today and will be sworn in on Monday by Caliph Baraq.
This is the guy we need to elect as President.
I like the fact that Ted Cruz doesn’t play the games they’ve been playing in the Congress, “I voted for it before I voted against it.” He tried his best to convince his cohort. But their eyes are not open to see their real duty in Congress.
We cannot waver. Keep up our faith, FRiends!
It was a spectacular job delivering the case against Obama, Holder, and Lynch. Hearing the persuasive evidence against Lynch presented by Cruz in his speech, the 20 Republican Senators who voted for cloture (John Cornyn of TX was one) and the 10 who voted to confirm Lynch deserve the rebuke of voters. The fact Cruz missed the final confirmation vote means nothing to me as his constituent; he fought hard throughout the Senate Judiciary hearing and at the appropriate time on the floor of the Senate.
The C-SPAN video linked in the article at top is an edited version with portions removed. The complete speech is here >>> Sen. Ted Cruz Urges Colleagues to Oppose the Loretta Lynch Nomination
0bama’s lawlessness continues aided and abetted by Republicans. If this continues who will consider themselves subject to law? In a banana republic money and firepower are what talks and the law walks.