Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/22/2015 5:28:14 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Maybe Krispy should offer up his government pension in solidarity.


2 posted on 04/22/2015 5:35:35 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It's the latter that Christie proposes. His "solution" to the impending bankruptcy of Social Security is to phase out benefits for retirees earning $80,000 to $200,000 and above and increase the retirement age from 67 to 69, and 62 to 64 for early retirement.

Continuing to raise the retirement age is an excellent idea - I would not have expected it from Christie. I still will not vote for him or for anyone who does not support (1) protecting our borders, (2) protecting our God-given right to keep and bear arms, and (3) repealing Obamacare. Still, it's nice to hear a leading RINO endorse the only responsible option. I'd add three years instead of two to the retirement ages, two months of age for each year that passes (so it would take eighteen years to add the full three years), since the program is not sustainable otherwise.

3 posted on 04/22/2015 5:36:24 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I would support pretty much everything in Christie’s Social Security plan and I’m of an age and in an income bracket where it would hit me fairly hard. I’d also support a fairly radical overhaul of Medicare. The money I’ve been paying in Social Security over the past 30 years is gone. Its not in some account. No one can give it back to me. the people who spent it — our parents, grandparents and great grand parents’ generations — are dead. Combine this with fairly large cuts in Welfare and other social welfare programs and we may actually put the country back on solid fiscal footing.


4 posted on 04/22/2015 5:38:20 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
This is as Don Quixote-esque a move as I've ever seen in politics. Though it makes perfect fiscal sense, how in the world does he (at a time when Liz Warren is out there lobbying to actually increase SS benefits, and drawing 70%+ approval in public polling) ever expect to pull it off?

5 posted on 04/22/2015 5:38:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
As a "step in the right direction" this is a tiny baby step.

There is a generation-sized chunk of cash which is simply -gone- due to demographic changes and the unwillingness of politicians to fund what they have "promised".

No one under 50-55 is ever going to get back what they have paid in, and the sooner this is faced the better for all concerned.

In order to make SocSec solvent, there must be either large tax increases on the young (which will not be reflected in their eventual benefits) or large benefit cuts (approx 20%) on recipients.

I would prefer the latter, and across the board rather than means tested.

7 posted on 04/22/2015 5:47:47 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (I wish someone would tell me what "diddy wah diddy" means.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Every economic savings reform is likely to affect some minorities.
If that's a showstopper then we have no choice but to spend more and more money.
Which is what we're doing already. It will break one day.

11 posted on 04/22/2015 5:51:30 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

How about freeing us from Social Security. Shut it down.

Pray America is waking


15 posted on 04/22/2015 6:09:58 AM PDT by bray (Cruz to the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I guess they’ll have to rework the mortality tables and put in tiered benefits so that the minorities get their fair share!! (/s)


18 posted on 04/22/2015 6:15:48 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A lot of freepers are suggesting it is okay for “means testing”. Any way you try to rationalize it, that is wealth redistribution and a socialist ideology! It is my money that went into the system, and I don’t cotton to supporting you in your old age! You might as well vote democrat if you support socialist progressive theft!


26 posted on 04/22/2015 6:59:39 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
SS is already "means" tested. They take the highest 35 years of salary to determine your benefit.

Which makes this real scary for SS....

"As of the 2010 census, the median age of whites was 41, blacks 32, and Hispanics 27"

But this all takes care of itself when the minimum wage goes to 20 bucks an hour.
33 posted on 04/22/2015 8:01:01 AM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

How about first eliminating government waste and fraud, streamlining welfare and entitlement programs (not SSN, which people DID pay into) by bringing back work search requirements, and bringing back jobs to American businesses so that folks that want to work actually can work, vs. being dependent upon big government? And how about cutting all those millions (billions?) in foreign aid and bribes to nations like Iran? Oh...I guess that’s out of the question and an unpopular agenda item with leftists and RINOs like Donut-Boy Christie.

Nevermind.


62 posted on 04/22/2015 2:02:49 PM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The SS tax was never intended to finance SS. It was put there in order to foster the lie that SS was “insurance.” Thus, the beneficiaries would scream bloody murder if SS was ever threatened. IT’S MY MONEY! I PAID IN!!!

SS was created to give the Democrats a big stick they could beat Republicans with for at least a century. THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY YOUR SOSHCURITY!!!

Politically, SS can never be reformed or “saved.” The only solution to SS is that one day, the bureaucrats will push the button to print the checks, and nothing will come out.


64 posted on 04/22/2015 7:38:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson