If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!See my tagline.
It’s awful.
I have NoScript and Ad Block Plus running or I wouldn’t even attempt to view the site.
So Rubio and Paul would come in second and third? There are only 3 people running right now. Cruz, Rubio and Paul. Until others announce this article is sorta early.
And that is what the majority of 2016 Iowa Caucus voters are looking for.
BOOM
Lets have some clarity in the primaries, for a change.
The pussy-footing around on issues like amnesty, gay marriage, and 2nd Amendment rights has doomed the declared as well as wannabe candidates for me. Cruz is the lone exception. We’ll see whether he turns out to have feet of clay, too.
Now Naps, I remember you from the last election cycle. I was for Newt, you for St. Rick. I never trolled your threads, so let’s start off on the right foot— and don’t start raining on my threads.
I like the title
As has been pointed out, the “moderates” believe the way to win is to be just a little to the right of the Rat and take the middle voters. They fail to notice that every time they try it they fail.
“.......the Wash Times website is a tangle of ads—”
Sorry, I gave up going to Wash Times site long ago. They overload the site with ads, and too often I was compelled to shut down, and restart as they jammed up freezing my ‘puter to the point I could not get out of the site without shutting down.
Very frustrating, and time consuming, so I don’t bother anymore.
One good thing-with all the other “conservative” candidates blowing their “conservative” credentials so soon in the race for whatever stupid reason, the vote shouldn’t be so divided amongst conservatives this time. It’s really Cruz or no one, for a dyed-in-the-wool conservative.
CRUZ or LOSE!Cruz is the clear choice. It’s not even close. He’s a man among boys, as will be demonstrated during the debates.
It was worth venturing to the website with AdBlock on guard. The major bullet points in the article are below to encourage others to take a look (hopefully this doesn't violate the FR excerpt policy):
1. You’re not entitled to anything.
2. Fighting for what we believe in is an accomplishment.
3. Conservatives want change agents, not managers.
4. Voters are looking to their futures, not your past.
5. People want to decide on a candidate early.
But, but, but Rand Paul is FORMITABLE I TELL YA !
So says some Rand Paul supporters in their delusional kookaid drunken stupor.
In reality Rand Paul smells of desperation like a guy being rejected by a woman multible times.
All Ted Cruz fans: PLEASE Contact Ted Cruz and tell him to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which would give President Obama nearly unstoppable power (Fast Track Authority) to negotiate a trade treaty to give Viet Nam, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and the WTO authority over US immigration policy.
Someone should send this to Matt Drudge.
The article appears to have been stuck out. How interesting.
Maybe it’s my browser or a ticked off editor.
THat place is pop up mania.
Love bold letters, not shouting...
Anyway..
ATTENTION : WHY IS IT ?
THE RAND PAUL SUPPORTERS HAVE NOT DEFENDED RAND PAUL’S SOCIALISED EDUCATION PLAN OF STICKING IT TO THE HARD WORKKNG OLDER TAX PAYERS BY GIVING COLLAGE STUDENTS A COLLAGE TUTION TAX RIGHT OFFS ?
COLLAGE TUTION TAX RIGHT OFFS IS SOCIALISED EDUCATION PAID FOR BY STICKING IT TO THE OLDER HARD WORKING TAX PAYERS...
WHY HAVE THEY NOT DEFENDED RAND PAUL’S SOCIALISED EDUCATION PLAN ?
#51 was meant for VinL.