Posted on 04/17/2015 9:44:39 PM PDT by Perseverando
Equipment like this is the product of cops wanting more and more equipment to militarize themselves. Like tanks and ever more present and dangerous SWAT teams.
I was wondering about that, too. I’m not a physicist, but it seems to me if something is powerful enough to blind you for 15 minutes, I would think it’s powerful enough for there to be a chance to cause permanent eye damage.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Correct. However if they pass some fed standard for output and exposure time, they will be considered harmless. And we will be unable to claim damages caused by them. Think taser, beanbag, pepper spray, etc.
There ya go. Cops today are expected to arrest the new breed of whiny-ass crybaby without harming them. When I started I had a revolver and a night stick. Over the next 30 years we got pepper spray. It killed a few people. We got Tazers, more people got killed. They banned the “choke” hold although it was one of the most effective ways to make an arrest. Now it’s so politically incorrect and considered to be “deadly force” that if you use it you might get charged or fired.
I say bring back the ‘good old days’ when a cop could pull a black-jack out of his pocket and deliver one smack to the forehead. Fight over.
Frankly, I have so much crap on my belt I don’t have room for any more. I don’t even want to wear the “bulletproof” vest let alone all the new politically correct snivel-gear you have to carry now. Any real street cop doesn’t want more electrical gadgets and foo-foo sprays, they want to deliver a good, old-fashioned wood shampoo.
When I started a guy that needed an ass-kicking got one and it was over with. Now after you look at them cross-eyed they want to run to their lawyer.
Within a year thugs will have these blinders and be using them to mug their victims.
No way this technology is restricted to LEOs.
***********************
Cheap Chinese copies on eBay within a year fo shure yo!
That is true. I’m thinking that the cops would go with a green wavelength laser (500~600nm?). The human eye is most sensitive to the green-yellow part of the spectrum, and a laser in that range would be the most effective at blinding someone without causing permanent damage. I would start their for a suitable pair of safety glasses.
...Urban Shield trade...
How nice. The gear queers, boot lickers and tyrannical statists have a place to meet.
When I started a guy that needed an ass-kicking got one and it was over with.
I sounds like you ought to be in jail.
Feels like batman running with all that crap on the utility belt. Now comes a camera.
It doesn’t seems like militarization to carry yet another non lethal device to go along with OC, taser, and a baton. Now if your department is buying an MRAP that’s a different thing entirely.
SEIU
had to look up what SEIU was. You’re probably right. At the time “The Jungle” was written, unions were needed. Now, not so much. I think I read that one out of FIVE federal employees spend their ENTIRE day doing union work. I could be wrong. But like peloser said, “there nothing left to cut”
Er, you do realize that imminent blindness and loss of life or limb are justifications for use of lethal force in the military, right?
This is going to get people killed.
brilliantidea by the authorities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.