Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tennessee Senate shelves bill that would name Bible as state book
Reuters ^ | 4/16/15 | Tim Ghianni

Posted on 04/16/2015 6:06:37 PM PDT by markomalley

A proposal to make the Bible the official state book of Tennessee, a measure the state attorney general had said would be unconstitutional, was effectively dropped for the year on Thursday by the state Senate, officials said.

The bill had been approved by the state House of Representatives on Wednesday over objections by Governor Bill Haslam, who called it disrespectful.

Attorney General Herbert Slatery III, religious leaders and others said the measure violated the separation of church and state under both the U.S. and Tennessee Constitutions.

Republicans, who hold strong majorities in the state House and Senate, were divided over the proposal, and the Senate on Thursday referred the proposal to its Judiciary Committee, which is not scheduled to meet again this session.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: bible; churchandstate; statebook; tennessee

1 posted on 04/16/2015 6:06:37 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Good! Here in Tennessee, every Christian I have spoken to is embarrassed by the proposal and thinks it is ridiculous to even suggest having a “state book.”


2 posted on 04/16/2015 6:08:24 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

These pandering ahole politicians trying to make points while failing to do their real job which is making America a better country. The Bible doesn’t need to be made a state book. Just keep it from being digitized by corrupt NYC publishers who will then edit it at will.


3 posted on 04/16/2015 6:15:26 PM PDT by apoliticalone (The ultimate mission of gun grabbers is to have elites armed and the masses subservient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa; apoliticalone; markomalley

I’m not convinced this is a good idea, but by the same token, I’m not convinced it’s a bad idea either.

Folks, naming a state book does not carry any weight of law.

It doesn’t mean that everyone has to abide by it’s teachings.

They have a state flower. It doesn’t mean everyone has to love that flower. It doesn’t mean everyone has to abide by certain laws related to the flower.

It’s the same with the state bird and other state designated objects.

All it does is show a deep respect for the book.


4 posted on 04/16/2015 6:20:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

If I didn’t know better I’d think this was proposed by a secular humanist leftist in an attempt to make conservatives look stupid with independents.


5 posted on 04/16/2015 6:40:30 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Defend your Freedom
KEEP FR GOING STRONG

Dear Friends, Please keep those donations coming in.
We depend on your continuing support to keep FR on the air.
If you have not yet made your donation,
please click the link and do so today.
Thank you very much.

6 posted on 04/16/2015 6:42:42 PM PDT by RedMDer (Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
However the Democrat version of the bill is being rushed right through.


7 posted on 04/16/2015 7:10:20 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

There are already enough stupid laws.
How about instead removing 500 do-nothing laws rom the books.


8 posted on 04/16/2015 8:33:01 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
I'd have to agree. This is stupid. Why the heck should there be a "state book" anyway? This is just pandering and a waste of time. I'm a follower of Christ, and I think it would be needlessly insulting to people of other faiths.

Not only that, it comes really close to being exactly what is prohibited by the Constitution. While it wouldn't be establish a state church, which is really what was targeted by the amendment, it would come close enough to be prohibited IMO.

9 posted on 04/17/2015 6:53:30 AM PDT by zeugma ( The Clintons Could Find a Loophole in a Stop Sign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNnice
I’d think this was proposed by a secular humanist leftist in an attempt to make conservatives look stupid

Heh. It also illustrates that the state legislators are obviously meeting for too long. Once a year, just enough time to write and pass a budget (say, three months), then go home and leave us alone!

10 posted on 04/17/2015 7:04:55 AM PDT by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson