Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A lot of Medicare Seniors would have been really "hot" over the issue if they had a 21% cut to their doctors and having a lot of doctors dropping out of Medicare ... :-) ...
1 posted on 04/14/2015 7:06:20 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

You would think they would be able to figure out a solution in less than a decade.


2 posted on 04/14/2015 7:11:31 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

Presidential candidates on the bill ...

Eight senators opposed the bill, including Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Marco Rubio (R-Florida) who are both seeking the presidency in 2016. They were joined by Sens. Lee, David Perdue (R-Georgia), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala).

Sen. Pand Paul (R-Ky.), another 2016 candidate, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is also considering a run, voted to support the bill.

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/238871-senate-overwhelmingly-approves-house-doc-fix-bill


4 posted on 04/14/2015 7:26:30 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

Perhaps. But I’m happy that Ted Cruz didn’t make the expedient vote, he voted the right way,


12 posted on 04/14/2015 7:53:44 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

The solution includes raising Medicare Part B premiums on “wealthy” seniors.


14 posted on 04/14/2015 8:02:53 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
The legislation moves Medicare in a direction espoused by Mr. Obama and many health policy experts, toward payment based on the quality and value of care, rather than just the volume of services. Organized medicine now accepts that change in principle, and the American Medical Association lobbied aggressively for passage of the bill, demanding that Congress “fix Medicare now.”

Before passing the bill, the Senate rejected a half-dozen proposed amendments on Tuesday night. Democrats, for example, wanted to provide more money for women’s health care. Republicans wanted to repeal a provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires most Americans to have health insurance, and they tried to force Congress to pay for the Medicare bill so it would not increase budget deficits.

The current payment formula, set by Congress in 1997, links Medicare spending on doctors’ services to growth of the overall economy. Medicare spending has regularly exceeded the targets. Under the law, the excess is supposed to be recouped in subsequent years through cuts in payment rates for doctors.

The bill would repeal that formula. Fiscal conservatives object because only one-third of the cost would be offset. The rest, $141 billion from 2015 to 2025, would add to federal budget deficits.

“This bill is not paid for,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama.

16 posted on 04/14/2015 8:07:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
New spending would total $211 billion over 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office estimated. Higher-income Medicare beneficiaries would pay additional premiums totaling nearly $35 billion, and Medicare would save a similar amount by trimming payments to hospitals, nursing homes and home health agencies.

Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, said the bill “doubles down on Medicare’s broken price control model” and “inflates the administration’s power as regulator and compliance officer.”

Paul Spitalnic, the chief actuary of the Medicare program, said the bill could lead to “a payment reduction for most physicians” after 2025. “If not addressed by subsequent legislation,” he said, “we expect that access to and quality of physicians’ services would deteriorate over time for beneficiaries.”

19 posted on 04/14/2015 8:10:46 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

I guessing this bill will help big health insurance companies, hurt doctors and hurt people on Medicare.


22 posted on 04/14/2015 8:21:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (Hillary Candidacy Like "Weekend At Bernie's" they'll have to keep proppering her up - H.Hewitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

“Mr. Obama has endorsed the bill, saying it “could help slow health care cost growth.””

Well of course, Obama is the logical choice to know all about reducing health care costs. /s


29 posted on 04/14/2015 8:37:39 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

Like the majority of Freepers, I’m on S/S and Medicare and I support this bill. Flame me, I don’t care.


41 posted on 04/14/2015 9:20:48 PM PDT by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

I don’t get it. Wouldn’t it be easier to put everyone on Obamacare and send them the $2,500 Check Obama promised us every Year?

The Dear Leader said Obamacare would save money and would Insure everybody. He wouldn’t lie to us, would he?


43 posted on 04/14/2015 9:21:39 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Advertising Space Available here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

The bill, drafted in the House in negotiations between Speaker John A. Boehner and Representative Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader


Vote GOPe get more BIG GOVT.


53 posted on 04/14/2015 10:09:34 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
The votes against the bill came from Republicans: Mr. Sessions and Mr. Lee, along with Senators Ted Cruz of Texas, David Perdue of Georgia, Marco Rubio of Florida, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Tim Scott of South Carolina and Richard C. Shelby of Alabama.

Good to know who's fiscally responsible

61 posted on 04/15/2015 3:05:52 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

Republicans having been tying to get this through since before 0bamacare was signed.


63 posted on 04/15/2015 3:57:09 AM PDT by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

Is this one of the gazillion bills Harry Reid wouldn’t bring up for vote?


65 posted on 04/15/2015 4:47:21 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler


75 posted on 04/15/2015 5:38:57 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

No cut means the burden is still on the young and those that have paid into this monstrosity for 40 years. Keep in mind, many seniors paid very little into the program. Cruz probably voted what was best for the country since BO was in support.


104 posted on 04/16/2015 10:03:11 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson