Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: magua

Warren may be calculating that she has a better chance if Hillary gets nominated and defeated in 2016—she would be the immediate frontrunner for 2020.


16 posted on 04/13/2015 8:09:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

There seem to be hatred between Barry and Bill. That could be a factor. It might be remote but anything can happen.


19 posted on 04/13/2015 8:15:37 AM PDT by magua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

If hillary is old warren is not far behind her. At this time she is 65 going on 66, b. 6/22/49.

in 2020 the cherokee princess would be 71 at the time of the election and going on 72 when inaugurated. Reagan was “only” nearly 70 on the day of his inauguration.

Time to get rid of the boomers in politics. I am a mid-boomer ‘55 and can say that. I think most of the generation that sought political office are dope smoking, hippie radicals. They need to go and go quickly.

I am coming to the point where I want to step aside and enjoy a few things I have not done in nearly 4 decades while I still feel like it. These political power brokers need to let the middle age people take over and shape their own future... the one the boomers have built for them is bleak. What the boomer candidates will put in place will shape a future they will be dead for... it is not important to them how it turns out.

Three score and 10 is the span of a man... the rest is gravy. Do these old hags like hillary and warren want to spend their last years screwing up more lives... what arrogance!


22 posted on 04/13/2015 8:31:42 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson