I actually had a greenie say we should put windmills on cars to power them.
I seen you guys joke about this on the forum, but I thought it was hyperbole only.
Boy are these global warming alarmist’s dumb.
Somebody at American Thinker chose to be lazy ...
After NASA, the largest user of Hydrogen is the US refining industry. Hydrogen is used to meet the EPA ultra-low sulfur fuel requirements.
Use that to "make" Hydrogen from water.
As a bonus, we may get to keep the monster from erupting?
Along with ethanol another net negative energy option.
I was expecting an article frought with scientific inconsistancies and urban chemistry myths. Yet the author’s premise is correct in that hydrogen, although yes it can store energy etc in principle, is difficult to handle safely for mass distribution for a variety of reasons, and isn’t the magic bullet of energy storage mediums that it is often touted to be.
I remember when a very “SMART” individual in the early 1900’s said; “EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE INVENTED, HAS ALREADY BEEN INVENTED”. In my opinion, at some time in the future, there will be a manor a woman, will invent, in his or her garage, a machine that will run on hydrogen. He or she will figure out a way to make it cheaply. I will remind everyone, that in the recent past (100+ years or so) aluminum was more expensive than silver, because there was no way to extract aluminum cheaply. I will also remind everyone, that a man, in his garage, invented a method to extract this metal very cheap. The rest is history
1. If there's any need to make liquid hydrogen, that cryogenic liquid is very hard to keep cold and is EXTREMELY dangerous to handle (that's why if a rocket fueled with liquid hydrogen explodes it goes off with the force of a tactical nuclear warhead).
2. Unfortunately, water vapor from hydrogen in a fuel cell automobile is a VASTLY more reactive greenhouse gas than even carbon dioxide.
I think I'll wait for the liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) so we can generate enough electricity on a gigantic scale to make burning any hydrocarbon fuel effectively obsolete.
“It is thus not a source of energy. It is merely a storehouse for energy a battery.”
Technically, nothing is a source of energy, since energy can never be created or destroyed.
Only a few gasses as dangerous as Hydrogen Group B. It can catch fire (almost invisible flame) with little 3 % or a lot of Oxygen (as high as 97%). Consider methane will only ignite from 5 - 15%.
H2 as rocket fuel days may be limited.
Elon Musk and others are working on a liquified natural gas motor that will make the parts reusable rather than throw away since CH3 liquifies at much higher temperature. As a fuel, somewhat less specific impulse but not enough to offset the savings.