Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conscience of a Conservative
a.(1) his backup was arriving and could and did render care. a(2) absent supplies, about the only care you can provide in that situation is to position the individual so that he doesn't aspirate.

b. You don't leave department property laying on the ground where you can't keep an eye on it and some bystander can walk off with it.

Not as inflammatory, but they make as much sense to me as a cop trying to "plant" a weapon that wouldn't help his case any.

57 posted on 04/07/2015 7:38:29 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: ArmstedFragg; Conscience of a Conservative
b. You don't leave department property laying on the ground where you can't keep an eye on it and some bystander can walk off with it.

That depends. If the officer alleges the suspect took one of his weapons, then that should make it evidence and part of a crime scene. And should remain undisturbed and secured.

63 posted on 04/07/2015 7:51:22 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: ArmstedFragg

“b. You don’t leave department property laying on the ground where you can’t keep an eye on it and some bystander can walk off with it.”

Nonsense. As soon as the officer fired his weapon, the location became a crime/investigation scene. You don’t move evidence in a crime scene simply because you don’t want to leave department property on the ground. If you are worried that a bystander will walk off with it, then keep an eye on it (or have someone else do the same).


78 posted on 04/07/2015 8:21:00 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: ArmstedFragg
a.(1) his backup was arriving and could and did render care.

a(2) absent supplies, about the only care you can provide in that situation is to position the individual so that he doesn't aspirate.

b. You don't leave department property laying on the ground where you can't keep an eye on it and some bystander can walk off with it.

Not as inflammatory, but they make as much sense to me as a cop trying to “plant” a weapon that wouldn't help his case any.

_______________________________________________________

I'm sorry but your logic is driving me crazy.

His backup was coming so he moved the tazer to where he could say the perp dropped it after being shot. His backup would not know any different and might make it a clean shoot.

“You don't leave department property on the ground”. You do leave that property on the ground and don't touch it if it is part of a crime scene.

The cop “clearly” planted a weapon. This is a bad cop. The perp might not be an angel but the cop is a murderer. It appears the cop was angry at the perp and too lazy to chase him so killed him. Unless he gets the death penalty it won't be enough.

This is one of the most sickening videos I have ever seen the only thing that makes me sicker is knowing that without the video he would have gotten away with it.

117 posted on 04/08/2015 11:57:05 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson