Replies

LOL, when you are losing it you start going with colors and your nonsensical irrelevant to the thread posts, start getting longer and longer.

Your defense of Cosby is evidently to just hijack the thread.

And how many cases against Bill Cosby were there before a year ago that we knew about?

Fifteen of them, two police reports one in 1998 and one in 2005, and an out of court settlement on a drugging/rape in 2006 that brought forth 13 of those victims who were willing to testify.

Your tactics to defend Cosby are so shallow, that it should embarrass you.

LOL, when you are losing it you start going with colors and your nonsensical irrelevant to the thread posts, start getting longer and longer.

I've never quite understood how getting your ass handed to you would be less objectionable if colors weren't used to make sure it's easy for folks to know who said what. All I know is that when folks feel they're losing, they zero in on the text color and try to make it the issue in part.

FAIL

Your defense of Cosby is evidently to just hijack the thread. My defense of a man who hasn't been coinvicted of anything yet, is just that. It's not too difficult to grasp if you can read and grasp reality.

And how many cases against Bill Cosby were there before a year ago that we knew about?

Fifteen of them, two police reports one in 1998 and one in 2005, and an out of court settlement on a drugging/rape in 2006 that brought forth 13 of those victims who were willing to testify.

So the answer is zero. Those police reports were not common knowledge to the public. So in theory only, we could have known of four, not fifteen. We didn't know about the 13 more than a year ago. There were only four on the record. And what happened to three of the four cases? They were never brought forward to trial. If they weren't, then there must have been a reason. Did the police have problems with those cases? I don't know the anwer to that, but it seems likely. As for the settlement, that could be an admission of guilt, or it might not be. Either way, it doesn't look good for Cosby.

I'm not sure you are willing to discuss this matter reasonably. I'm not saying things that are untrue. I've seen people come foward to say a lot of things in my life. Sadly, a lot of them were untrue, or extremely slanted versions of the truth.

Your tactics to defend Cosby are so shallow, that it should embarrass you.

Since I have readily admitted it doesn't look good for Cosby, and that I think it looks at this point like he is guilty, I'm not quite sure how you see that as a defense of him. Your, "Oh, so you think it looks like he's guilty, well damn it, quit defending him like that!" comments should embarrass you. Evidently they don't.

This was my first post on this thread. I don't think the comments were disruptive, and they certainly weren't defensive of Cosby. In it I stated it was looking pretty bad for Cosby. Ahhhh, you diagreed with that?

Beyond that, I touched on the sadness I feel that leading Black men don't set better examples for Black youth. Why you decided to go postal in response is beyond me. You and I agree on a number of points here..