Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steinitz: Parameters of Iranian nuclear agreement ‘detached from reality’ (Israel's reaction)
Jerusalem Post ^ | 04/02/2015 21:56 | HERB KEINON

Posted on 04/02/2015 12:14:06 PM PDT by Dave346

Israeli officials once again begin talking about "military option."

The smiles that accompanied the announcement Thursday of parameters for an Iranian nuclear agreement in Lausanne between the world powers and Iran are detached from reality, International Relations Minister Yuval Steinitz said in Jerusalem's initial reaction to the developments.

The reality, Steinitz said, is that Iran refused to make any concession on the nuclear issue and continues to threaten Israel and all other countries in the Middle East.

Even before the press conference in Lausanne where the announcement was made, the Prime Minister's Office posted the following message on twitter: “Any deal must significantly roll back Iran's nuclear capabilities and stop its terrorism and aggression.”

The tweet was posted above a map with arrows leading from Tehran to Yemen, Gaza, Israel, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq under the headline, “Iran's aggression during the nuclear negotiations.”

Government officials made clear that Israel will continue publicly fighting against the deal, emphasizing Iran's aggressive behavior throughout the Middle East even at a time when it does not yet have nuclear capabilities.

“At a time when the representatives of the world powers were shaking hands with the Iranians in Lausanne, Iran continues its campaign of occupation and terror in Yemen and throughout the Middle East,” he said.

Steinitz said that since Thursday's declaration was a long way from being a full agreement, “we will continue in our efforts to explain and convince the world in the hopes of preventing a bad deal, or at least introducing changes and improvements.”

Even before the parameters were presented, Steinitz joined senior Israeli officials who in recent days began speaking about the possibility of Israeli military action, after months in which the idea had not been spoken about publicly.

Asked on Israel Radio whether Jerusalem would consider a military operation even against US opposition, Steinitz said “if we have no choice, we have no choice.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hinted in recent days that Israel would not feel bound by any agreement eventually signed, but Steinitz's words were the most explicit in a while that Israel had definitely not taken the military option “off the table.”

“I don't want to talk about a military option, other than to say that it exists,” he said. “I just want to say one thing, when we had no choice and needed to attack and destroy the reactor in Iraq [in 1981], that was against the US position.”

“When talking about our national security,” Steinitz continued, “it is our responsibility and duty to to defend the state, and if the world has other ideas or illusions or agreements that do not ensure our security, we will need to weigh very carefully what to do.”

Steinitz said that Israel is working on the diplomat and intelligence levels, and that – if it is necessary – we leave the military option on the table.

Meanwhile, in an interview with Israel Hayom, Maj. Gen. Nimrod Sheffer – the head of the IDF Planning Directorate – said when asked whether he could imagine a situation where Israel would bomb Iran against US wishes, that “since it happened in the past, I have no reason to believe it won't happen again.”

“If ultimately an agreement is in fact signed, we will have to ask ourselves, 'Okay, what are we going to do with this?'” he said. “If someone builds a bomb and at the same time declares that Israel has no right to exist, we have to think about how to respond." He said that if Israel feels its existence depends on taking action, it will do so.


TOPICS: Egypt; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; Russia; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aprilfoolsirandeal; bomb; egypt; irandealframework; israel; israeldefense; nuclear; russia; steinitz; syria; terror; war; waronterror

1 posted on 04/02/2015 12:14:06 PM PDT by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dave346

Obama’s buzz-kill.


2 posted on 04/02/2015 12:16:00 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

Maybe some good will come of this if it results in an alliance between Egypt, Israel, and Saudi Arabia against Iran.


3 posted on 04/02/2015 12:19:03 PM PDT by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

Only the stupid, the liberal, and the MSM (but I repeat myself) believes Dorkbama and his West Wing Clown Show of Felon/Cretins.


4 posted on 04/02/2015 12:19:30 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

And the situation in Yemen is falling all apart. Houtis have entered Aden and are about to loot the Yemen Central Bank. Chinese troops had to help evacuate Chinese citizens in Aden after the evacuees came under fire. Saudi air strikes have not stopped Houti advances. And Al qeada in the east freed a few hundred of their prisoners from a Yemen jail. Looks like the Arabs are gonna give Israel a green light. Uncle Sammy is holding a worthless piece of paper.


5 posted on 04/02/2015 12:27:04 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way. Was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

“The smiles in Lausanne are detached from wretched reality in which Iran refuses to make any concessions on the nuclear issue and continues to threaten Israel and all other countries in the Middle East,” Steinitz said in a statement. “We will continue with our efforts to explain and persuade the world in hopes of preventing a bad (final) agreement.”

http://www.jta.org/2015/04/02/news-opinion/united-states/auto-draft-76


6 posted on 04/02/2015 12:42:26 PM PDT by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

quit jerking around with these a-holes and NUKE iran.


7 posted on 04/02/2015 1:02:01 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

So Iran can continue to do research and keeps open its nuke sites according to Drudge. What did Iran lose out on?


8 posted on 04/02/2015 1:10:08 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

Decapitate the Iranian leadership. Let the country fall into chaos and revolution - that’ll slow down their nuke program, and quite possibly result in a sane government.

I blame not only the evil Obama for this, along with his enablers like Valerie Jarett, but the one person most responsible for the existence of this government in Iran - Jimmy f’ing Carter, may his soul soon rot in Hell.


9 posted on 04/02/2015 1:39:31 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

10 posted on 04/02/2015 2:27:39 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

If the treaty is really as bad and as dangerous as we believe it is, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and ? will take out their nuclear sites.

Obozo and Kerry will find out about that action when they see a replay on Fox News.


11 posted on 04/02/2015 2:35:40 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will Sisi, Bibi, King Abdullah & ?, take out Isis in our White House, AG Dept, CIA, & State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave346

Evil loves Chaos. bozo WANTS to provoke Israel because then bozo can go after Israel with a vengence.


12 posted on 04/02/2015 2:35:53 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo 2zxunph.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


13 posted on 04/02/2015 2:36:39 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Asked on Israel Radio whether Jerusalem would consider a military operation even against US opposition, Steinitz said "if we have no choice, we have no choice." Steinitz's words were the most explicit in a while that Israel had definitely not taken the military option "off the table." "I don't want to talk about a military option, other than to say that it exists," he said. "I just want to say one thing, when we had no choice and needed to attack and destroy the reactor in Iraq [in 1981], that was against the US position."

14 posted on 04/02/2015 2:55:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

There isn’t really any need to take out the Persian nuke sites directly. The one thing they all need to operate at any level whatsoever is electricity. I haven’t looked lately to see what the mix of electric generation is in Iran but the Bushere plant, which is right on the coast like a sitting duck, is a big part of it. All that’s necessary to stop the mullahz for a good long time is to shut down their generation. There is no way the Russians built enough stuff into that reactor containment to stop one of our bunker busters which Israel has at least 2500 of.

I look to see the mullahz spinning their centrifuges with a long ball of string before long. The neatest underground plant in the world, without electricity, is just a cave. And backup generators, even if they have them, can’t work for long underground. It’s fascinating why we put up with these putzes?


15 posted on 04/02/2015 5:18:29 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cherokee1

“There isn’t really any need to take out the Persian nuke sites directly. The one thing they all need to operate at any level whatsoever is electricity. I haven’t looked lately to see what the mix of electric generation is in Iran but the Bushere plant, which is right on the coast like a sitting duck, is a big part of it. All that’s necessary to stop the mullahz for a good long time is to shut down their generation. “

Thanks, I wasn’t aware of this.


16 posted on 04/03/2015 8:34:47 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will Sisi, Bibi, King Abdullah & ?, take out Isis in our White House, AG Dept, CIA, & State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

This treaty makes war almost inevetible.


17 posted on 04/03/2015 10:14:12 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Will Clown Prince nobama be required to return his “peace” prize?


18 posted on 04/03/2015 10:26:21 AM PDT by ogen hal (First Amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson