If they ask you to host an event, even for only two people, you can refuse to support it.
I admit I don’t see the difference and it strikes me as a pretty hypocritical. But still I agree that they should have the right to stand by their religious beliefs.
In instance one, they are there to eat. you are not sponsoring or hosting anything. You are supplying human beings with food for a price and you don’t care what they believe or talk about at their table.
In instance one, you are hosting an event that has as its purpose something you are morally or some other way against. You should have a right to refuse to allow your facilities to be used for it.
Sorry but I still don’t see the difference.
In instance one, you are hosting an event that has as its purpose something you are morally or some other way against.
first off, I take it you meant to say in instance two, since your first instance was termed ‘one’...
You should have a right to refuse to allow your facilities to be used for it.
that is indeed the crux of the matter, is it not? That is what this entire kerfuffle will determine.
I suspect few on this forum will like the results...