.jpg )
Posted on 03/31/2015 3:45:06 PM PDT by C19fan
Southern California athletic director Pat Haden will not attend the College Football Playoff selection committee meeting in Indianapolis this week because of a new Indiana religious-freedom law that critics fear could permit discrimination against gays and lesbians.
Haden posted on Twitter at (at)ADHadenUSC: "I am the proud father of a gay son. In his honor, I will not be attending the CFP committee meeting in Indy this week. (hash)EmbraceDiversity."
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
14th Amendment, Section 1:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Haden is gay?
Just wow!
This person holds a position of authority and makes decisions.
What a shame he makes such an uninformed decision.
Par for the course from the University of Spoiled Children.
Whine On!
“In his honor”???
No one should be forced to swallow the homosexual agenda. Indiana had a state constitutional law defining marriage as only between one man and one woman. A single judge decided to overturn the will of the people, which is why Indiana passed the Religious Freedom law. The Religious Freedom law is now the law of the land. I don’t see you or other homosexuals abiding by that law, so do not expect me to abide by your fake phony marriage laws.
the faggots should protest by having a million cornhole march.
He’s most likely a puppet and is being told what to say/do by the powers that be.
“I am the proud father of a gay son.”
I cannot say deregulatory things about a father still “loving” his son should the son claim homosexual status.
However, to say “I am proud..” is disgusting. I suppose if he were to take up bestiality, he would be a proud father of whatever you would call that? How about if his son was to become a pederast to some catamite? Would he be the proud father of a pederast? Love has no limits, but acceptance of and embracing of deviancy does.
This from a Rhodes Scholar?
The Founding States made the 10th Amendment (10A) to clarify that the Constitution’s silence about things like marriage means that such issues are automaticaly and uniquely state power issues. And since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay agenda issues, such as gay marriage, the states are free to make 10A-protected laws which prohibit gay marriage, as long as such laws don’t also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.
So if his son was "straight" he would not be?
That’s a costly, time-consuming way to learn about Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
On the other hand, I think that the left like making propaganda movies.
That’s a costly, time-consuming way to learn about Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
On the other hand, I think that the left like making propaganda movies.
USC grad? Ha.
Thumped in the head too many times?
Dense or what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.